{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"27c5d794-0c08-524c-955f-aae6f60cb06e","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--27c5d794-0c08-524c-955f-aae6f60cb06e","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: foamflower lawful cayenne chandigarh only excursion declassify equanimity aseptic inclement october debauch kruger groupoid scorch dingy alterate\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"foamflower\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"lawful\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"cayenne\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"chandigarh\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"only\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"excursion\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"declassify\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"equanimity\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"aseptic\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"inclement\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"october\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"debauch\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"kruger\\\": \\\"k\\\" (11). \\\"groupoid\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"scorch\\\": \\\"s\\\" (18). \\\"dingy\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"alterate\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"aseptic\\\" ? \\\"alterate\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cayenne\\\" ? \\\"chandigarh\\\"] < (4) [\\\"debauch\\\" ? \\\"declassify\\\" ? \\\"dingy\\\"] < (5) [\\\"excursion\\\" ? \\\"equanimity\\\"] < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"scorch\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"aseptic\\\" ? \\\"alterate\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"aseptic\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"alterate\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12).\\nThought 4: We now have: (12) \\\"alterate\\\" < (19) \\\"aseptic\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cayenne\\\" ? \\\"chandigarh\\\"] < (4) [\\\"debauch\\\" ? \\\"declassify\\\" ? \\\"dingy\\\"] < (5) [\\\"excursion\\\" ? \\\"equanimity\\\"] < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"scorch\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cayenne\\\" ? \\\"chandigarh\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"cayenne\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"chandigarh\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] < (3) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" < (4) [\\\"debauch\\\" ? \\\"declassify\\\" ? \\\"dingy\\\"] < (5) [\\\"excursion\\\" ? \\\"equanimity\\\"] < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"scorch\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"debauch\\\" ? \\\"declassify\\\" ? \\\"dingy\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"debauch\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"declassify\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"dingy\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"debauch\\\" < (5) \\\"declassify\\\" < (9) \\\"dingy\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] < (3) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" < (4) \\\"debauch\\\" < (5) \\\"declassify\\\" < (9) \\\"dingy\\\" < (5) [\\\"excursion\\\" ? \\\"equanimity\\\"] < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"scorch\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"excursion\\\" ? \\\"equanimity\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"excursion\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"equanimity\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 10: We now have: (3) \\\"excursion\\\" < (21) \\\"equanimity\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] < (3) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" < (4) \\\"debauch\\\" < (5) \\\"declassify\\\" < (9) \\\"dingy\\\" < (5) \\\"excursion\\\" < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"scorch\\\" < (21) \\\"equanimity\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"only\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"only\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"october\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3).\\nThought 12: We now have: (3) \\\"october\\\" < (14) \\\"only\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] < (3) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" < (4) \\\"debauch\\\" < (5) \\\"declassify\\\" < (9) \\\"dingy\\\" < (5) \\\"excursion\\\" < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) \\\"october\\\" < (18) \\\"scorch\\\" < (21) \\\"equanimity\\\".\\nThought 13: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"alterate\\\" ? \\\"aseptic\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"alterate\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"aseptic\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19).\\nThought 14: We now have: (12) \\\"alterate\\\" < (19) \\\"aseptic\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alterate\\\" < \\\"aseptic\\\" < (3) \\\"cayenne\\\" < (8) \\\"chandigarh\\\" < (4) \\\"debauch\\\" < (5) \\\"declassify\\\" < (9) \\\"dingy\\\" < (5) \\\"excursion\\\" < (6) \\\"foamflower\\\" < (7) \\\"groupoid\\\" < (9) \\\"inclement\\\" < (11) \\\"kruger\\\" < (12) \\\"lawful\\\" < (15) \\\"october\\\" < (18) \\\"scorch\\\" < (21) \\\"equanimity\\\".\\nThought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is alterate aseptic cayenne chandigarh debauch declassify dingy excursion equanimity foamflower groupoid inclement kruger lawful october scorch\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}