{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"2e20462d-f626-5d7f-9c0a-8d0826fbfee2","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--2e20462d-f626-5d7f-9c0a-8d0826fbfee2","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: schroeder cheerful sagacious turquoise chlorine murder joust cancelling catharsis insufferable veto blare fishpond lemma chaos ionic advert cossack wahl ama\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"schroeder\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"cheerful\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"sagacious\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"turquoise\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"chlorine\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"murder\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"joust\\\": \\\"j\\\" (10). \\\"cancelling\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"catharsis\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"insufferable\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"veto\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"blare\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"fishpond\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"lemma\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"chaos\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"ionic\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"advert\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cossack\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"wahl\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"ama\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"advert\\\" ? \\\"ama\\\"] < (2) \\\"blare\\\" < (3) [\\\"chlorine\\\" ? \\\"cheerful\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\" ? \\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"cossack\\\"] < (6) \\\"fishpond\\\" < (9) [\\\"insufferable\\\" ? \\\"ionic\\\"] < (10) \\\"joust\\\" < (12) \\\"lemma\\\" < (13) \\\"murder\\\" < (19) [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] < (20) \\\"turquoise\\\" < (22) \\\"veto\\\" < (23) \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"advert\\\" ? \\\"ama\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"advert\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"ama\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13).\\nThought 4: We now have: (4) \\\"advert\\\" < (13) \\\"ama\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"advert\\\" < \\\"ama\\\" < \\\"blare\\\" < [\\\"chlorine\\\" ? \\\"cheerful\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\" ? \\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"cossack\\\"] < \\\"fishpond\\\" < [\\\"insufferable\\\" ? \\\"ionic\\\"] < \\\"joust\\\" < \\\"lemma\\\" < \\\"murder\\\" < [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] < \\\"turquoise\\\" < \\\"veto\\\" < \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"chlorine\\\" ? \\\"cheerful\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\" ? \\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"cossack\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"chlorine\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"cheerful\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"chaos\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cancelling\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"catharsis\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cossack\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) [\\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\"] < (5) \\\"cheerful\\\" < (8) \\\"chlorine\\\" < (15) \\\"cossack\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"advert\\\" < \\\"ama\\\" < \\\"blare\\\" < [\\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\"] < \\\"cheerful\\\" < \\\"chlorine\\\" < \\\"cossack\\\" < \\\"fishpond\\\" < [\\\"insufferable\\\" ? \\\"ionic\\\"] < \\\"joust\\\" < \\\"lemma\\\" < \\\"murder\\\" < [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] < \\\"turquoise\\\" < \\\"veto\\\" < \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cancelling\\\" ? \\\"catharsis\\\" ? \\\"chaos\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"cancelling\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"catharsis\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"chaos\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 8: We now have: (3) \\\"cancelling\\\" < (15) \\\"chaos\\\" < (20) \\\"catharsis\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"advert\\\" < \\\"ama\\\" < \\\"blare\\\" < \\\"cancelling\\\" < \\\"chaos\\\" < \\\"catharsis\\\" < \\\"cheerful\\\" < \\\"chlorine\\\" < \\\"cossack\\\" < \\\"fishpond\\\" < [\\\"insufferable\\\" ? \\\"ionic\\\"] < \\\"joust\\\" < \\\"lemma\\\" < \\\"murder\\\" < [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] < \\\"turquoise\\\" < \\\"veto\\\" < \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"insufferable\\\" ? \\\"ionic\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"insufferable\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"ionic\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 10: We now have: (15) \\\"ionic\\\" < (21) \\\"insufferable\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"advert\\\" < \\\"ama\\\" < \\\"blare\\\" < \\\"cancelling\\\" < \\\"chaos\\\" < \\\"catharsis\\\" < \\\"cheerful\\\" < \\\"chlorine\\\" < \\\"cossack\\\" < \\\"fishpond\\\" < \\\"ionic\\\" < \\\"insufferable\\\" < \\\"joust\\\" < \\\"lemma\\\" < \\\"murder\\\" < [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] < \\\"turquoise\\\" < \\\"veto\\\" < \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"sagacious\\\" ? \\\"schroeder\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"sagacious\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"schroeder\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3).\\nThought 12: We now have: (1) \\\"sagacious\\\" < (3) \\\"schroeder\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"advert\\\" < \\\"ama\\\" < \\\"blare\\\" < \\\"cancelling\\\" < \\\"chaos\\\" < \\\"catharsis\\\" < \\\"cheerful\\\" < \\\"chlorine\\\" < \\\"cossack\\\" < \\\"fishpond\\\" < \\\"ionic\\\" < \\\"insufferable\\\" < \\\"joust\\\" < \\\"lemma\\\" < \\\"murder\\\" < \\\"sagacious\\\" < \\\"schroeder\\\" < \\\"turquoise\\\" < \\\"veto\\\" < \\\"wahl\\\".\\nThought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is advert ama blare cancelling catharsis chaos cheerful chlorine cossack fishpond ionic insufferable joust lemma murder sagacious schroeder turquoise veto wahl\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}