{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"musr","formal_name":"MuSR","introduction":"MuSR poses multistep soft reasoning problems over algorithmically generated narratives. It has three domains — murder mysteries, object placements and team allocation — and this catalogue imports all three domains, 756 problems in total.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"2fe73ec3-6c4e-5ced-a0d5-d690b1210a11","task_key":"default--team~5fallocation--2fe73ec3-6c4e-5ced-a0d5-d690b1210a11","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…","config":"default","split":"team_allocation","body":"{\"choices\":\"['Piloting: James, Research: Ellen and Rebecca', 'Piloting: Ellen, Research: James and Rebecca', 'Piloting: Rebecca, Research: Ellen and James']\",\"narrative\":\"As dawn broke, I found myself in my office, gazing at the boundless cosmos through my window, pondering over the imminent space exploration mission. The task of leading the mission was daunting, but the real puzzle lay in assigning the crucial roles of Piloting and Research among the crew members - Ellen, James, and Rebecca. The challenge was to place each one where they could excel and contribute meaningfully to our collective objective.\\n\\nEllen was a competent crew member, her stern demeanor commanded the room, and often posed a challenge for the rest of the crew. Her background as a commercial pilot and her education in aviation was an asset to our mission. Though a constant feature of our team dynamic was the public criticisms she tended to make – and most recently, her words had been scrutinizing Rebecca’s competence and their differences over the mission plans.\\n\\nEllen was the very definition of straightforward, a characteristic that James often found confronting. She preferred action over analysis; being at the helm and making direct decisions was her strengths. Undeniably, she was at her best under pressure, remaining calm and focused.\\n\\nThen there was James. Passionate about practical work, he was more comfortable with a wrench in his hand than piloting a spaceship. With experience in auto repair and construction, the cockpit filled him with noticeable discomfort. James, unfortunately, was not fond of Rebecca’s background in the arts, arguing that it brought nothing fruitful to our scientific venture. Furthermore, he carried a simmering grudge against Ellen for dismissing his previous design blueprint.\\n\\nLastly, there was Rebecca. Rebecca had a fear of piloting the spacecraft alone, and her understanding of complex scientific theories was still a work in progress. It was clear the cockpit was a domain she wished to avoid. She often clashed with James due to his dismissive attitude and lack of respectful communication. Despite some struggles, Rebecca showed enthusiasm in getting involved in the physical aspects of our journey.\\n\\nCycling through these thoughts, I took a last sip of my coffee, looking at the profiles spread on my desk. I knew that the perfect assignment was there, within my reach; I just had to connect the dots. The friction between them was not a weakness, but a flare of their strong points of view.\\n\\nYes, they were different and filled with contradictions, but there was no doubt that all three were capable of excellence. The mismatched puzzle pieces were starting to fit perfectly now; each one designed for a specific role that suited their backgrounds and interests. The solution lay not in the discord, but in playing to their respective strengths - weakness turned into strengths, disagreement translating into dynamic growth.\\n\\nThe spaceship was ready to embark, and so were its crew members. All that was left was to assign them their roles. Contemplating the task at hand, I knew that whatever their past disagreements, it was crucial to cohesively work as a team. After all, the success of the mission depended on it. Little did they know how pivotal their contradictory backgrounds and opposing viewpoints were to our shared mission - we only had to align them wisely! One thing was certain: I had a challenging but equally exciting task in front of me. And I was ready.\",\"question\":\"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}