{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"3a421bc4-f38f-5bd9-b370-fba517125397","task_key":"bbeh~5fsarc~5ftriples--full--3a421bc4-f38f-5bd9-b370-fba517125397","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Here are three (post, reply) pairs from Reddit. Your task is to decide whether…","config":"bbeh_sarc_triples","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"Here are three (post, reply) pairs from Reddit. Your task is to decide whether each reply is sarcastic. Specifically, label each pair with a \\\"0\\\" or \\\"1\\\", wherea \\\"1\\\" indicates that the reply is sarcastic, and a \\\"0\\\" indicates that the reply does not contain sarcasm, and provide your final answer as a comma-separated set of labels (e.g., \\\"1,0,0\\\" or \\\"0,0,0\\\").\\n\\nPOST 1: I don't blame Cruz for being a real life Elmer Gantry, I blame the idiots who voted for his dumb ass.\\nREPLY 1: and that's why the good people of LA and NY should protect their 2nd amendment right to carry concealed nukes.\\n\\nPOST 2: Threatening a nation with military action, what a great fucking idea to stop them from entering a defense pact!\\nREPLY 2: Yeah, and with Finalnd being part of the Nordic Battle Group.... I don't think you wanna attack Sweden and have Simo Hayha's decendents stacking russians higer than the treetops.\\n\\nPOST 3: Atheist academic calls for religion 'to be offended at every opportunity': Dawkins says it's ridiculous to be accused of racism when you criticise Islam\\nREPLY 3: I think a lot of people get it wrong, here's a simple guide: **When you should offend** - When people are unfairly asserting themselves on you - When people believe in capital punishment even though it is fucked up, has been abandoned by most of the world, and doesn't act as a deterrent or save prison space or money - When people believe in flogging, amputation and other disgusting 'punishments' **When you should avoid offending** - When people have beliefs that seem silly to you but are not realistically causing problems - When you're doing it for no other reason than because you can - When it's divisive and doesn't actually help the situation (i.e., cause people to change their minds)\\n\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}