{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"mmlu-pro","formal_name":"MMLU-Pro","introduction":"MMLU-Pro rebuilds MMLU with ten answer options instead of four and removes items that no longer separate models. Questions span fourteen academic and professional subjects.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"52a2e239-4bd5-5a17-a1e9-1cc1114990c4","task_key":"default--test--1569","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"1569","short_description":"In 1993, a rancher had good record title to a 20-acre orange grove in fee simple…","config":"default","split":"test","body":"{\"category\":\"law\",\"options\":\"['In a notice jurisdiction, the grower, as a subsequent bonafide purchaser, is only chargeable with notice of what appears in his chain of title and, therefore, would acquire record title to the orange grove.', 'In a race \\\\x80\\\\x94notice jurisdiction, the farmer would acquire equitable title to the orange grove, because he erected the fence and failed to inform the buyer of the prior rancher-to-son instrument.', 'In a race-notice jurisdiction, the farmer, having recorded his deed first, would acquire record title to the orange grove.', 'In a race-notice jurisdiction, the grower, being the last to record, would acquire record title to the orange grove.', 'In a notice jurisdiction, the retiree would acquire record title to the orange grove even though he failed to record his deed.', 'In a race-notice jurisdiction, the son would acquire record title to the orange grove, because he is the original grantee.', 'In a race jurisdiction, the buyer, having recorded his deed before the grower, would acquire record title to the orange grove.', 'In a notice jurisdiction, the retiree, despite not recording his deed, would acquire equitable title to the orange grove due to his payment and receipt of the deed.', 'In a notice jurisdiction, the rancher retains record title to the orange grove, as he never properly conveyed his title.']\",\"question\":\"In 1993, a rancher had good record title to a 20-acre orange grove in fee simple absolute. In 1994, the rancher delivered to his son, for a sum of $1,000, a deed signed by the rancher, naming the son and his heirs as grantee, and appearing valid on its face. The son neglected to record the deed. In 1998, a farmer, aware of the existence of the rancher-to-son deed, sought out the rancher and asked to buy for $10,000 a deed to the orange grove from the rancher to the fanner and his heirs. The rancher executed such a deed, and the fanner promptly recorded it. The farmer's intent was to acquire color of title and obtain ownership of the orange grove by adverse possession. In 1998, the farmer constructed a fence around the orange grove. In 1999, the son presented his deed of the orange grove to a retiree, and for $15,000, paid by the retiree, signed and delivered a deed of the orange grove in favor of the retiree and his heirs. After receiving the deed, the retiree made no effort to search the title, to examine the property, or to record the deed. In 2003, a buyer paid the fanner $20,000, and the farmer delivered to the buyer a deed of the orange grove in favor of the buyer and his heirs. The buyer had examined the property, had searched the title, and had no knowledge of the farmer's awareness of the prior rancher-to-son instrument. Although the buyer did not reside on the property, he regularly visited the orange grove twice a week. The buyer recorded his deed. In 2007 for $25,000 paid by an orange grower, the retiree signed and delivered adeed of the orange grove naming the orange grower and his heirs as grantees. Before the grower had paid the retiree and taken his deed, the grower visited the orange grove and observed the fence. However, the buyer was not present when the grower visited the property and nothing suggested who €”if anyone €”was using it. In any case, the grower did not attempt to search the title before making his purchase. This jurisdiction uses Grantor €”Grantee Indices and has no Tract Index. In 2008, what is the present state of title to the orange grove if the jurisdiction's recording act provides: \\\"Every conveyance of real property shall be invalid as against any person, except the grantor, his heirs, and assigns, having actual notice thereof, unless it is recorded as provided by statute\\\"?\",\"src\":\"ori_mmlu-professional_law\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}