{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"58b078e0-17bb-5b0c-b678-e7e49ac0ee6a","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--58b078e0-17bb-5b0c-b678-e7e49ac0ee6a","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: plagiarism padre hiss versus permutation ridicule articulate showmen northumberland landowner valparaiso bootleg saskatoon liable corroborate shrinkage\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"plagiarism\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"padre\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"hiss\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"versus\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"permutation\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"ridicule\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"articulate\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"showmen\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"northumberland\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"landowner\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"valparaiso\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"bootleg\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"saskatoon\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"liable\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"corroborate\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"shrinkage\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) \\\"articulate\\\" < (2) \\\"bootleg\\\" < (3) \\\"corroborate\\\" < (8) \\\"hiss\\\" < (12) [\\\"landowner\\\" ? \\\"liable\\\"] < (14) \\\"northumberland\\\" < (16) [\\\"padre\\\" ? \\\"permutation\\\" ? \\\"plagiarism\\\"] < (18) \\\"ridicule\\\" < (19) [\\\"saskatoon\\\" ? \\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] < (22) [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"].\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"landowner\\\" ? \\\"liable\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"landowner\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"liable\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 4: We now have: (1) \\\"landowner\\\" < (9) \\\"liable\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"articulate\\\" < \\\"bootleg\\\" < \\\"corroborate\\\" < \\\"hiss\\\" < \\\"landowner\\\" < \\\"liable\\\" < \\\"northumberland\\\" < [\\\"padre\\\" ? \\\"permutation\\\" ? \\\"plagiarism\\\"] < \\\"ridicule\\\" < [\\\"saskatoon\\\" ? \\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] < [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"].\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"padre\\\" ? \\\"permutation\\\" ? \\\"plagiarism\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"padre\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"permutation\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"plagiarism\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) \\\"padre\\\" < (5) \\\"permutation\\\" < (12) \\\"plagiarism\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"articulate\\\" < \\\"bootleg\\\" < \\\"corroborate\\\" < \\\"hiss\\\" < \\\"landowner\\\" < \\\"liable\\\" < \\\"northumberland\\\" < \\\"padre\\\" < \\\"permutation\\\" < \\\"plagiarism\\\" < \\\"ridicule\\\" < [\\\"saskatoon\\\" ? \\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] < [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"].\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"saskatoon\\\" ? \\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"saskatoon\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"showmen\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"shrinkage\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"saskatoon\\\" < (8) [\\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"articulate\\\" < \\\"bootleg\\\" < \\\"corroborate\\\" < \\\"hiss\\\" < \\\"landowner\\\" < \\\"liable\\\" < \\\"northumberland\\\" < \\\"padre\\\" < \\\"permutation\\\" < \\\"plagiarism\\\" < \\\"ridicule\\\" < \\\"saskatoon\\\" < [\\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] < [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"].\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"showmen\\\" ? \\\"shrinkage\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"showmen\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"shrinkage\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 10: We now have: (18) \\\"shrinkage\\\" < (23) \\\"showmen\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"articulate\\\" < \\\"bootleg\\\" < \\\"corroborate\\\" < \\\"hiss\\\" < \\\"landowner\\\" < \\\"liable\\\" < \\\"northumberland\\\" < \\\"padre\\\" < \\\"permutation\\\" < \\\"plagiarism\\\" < \\\"ridicule\\\" < \\\"saskatoon\\\" < \\\"shrinkage\\\" < \\\"showmen\\\" < [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"].\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"valparaiso\\\" ? \\\"versus\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"valparaiso\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"versus\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 12: We now have: (1) \\\"valparaiso\\\" < (5) \\\"versus\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"articulate\\\" < \\\"bootleg\\\" < \\\"corroborate\\\" < \\\"hiss\\\" < \\\"landowner\\\" < \\\"liable\\\" < \\\"northumberland\\\" < \\\"padre\\\" < \\\"permutation\\\" < \\\"plagiarism\\\" < \\\"ridicule\\\" < \\\"saskatoon\\\" < \\\"shrinkage\\\" < \\\"showmen\\\" < \\\"valparaiso\\\" < \\\"versus\\\".\\nThought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is articulate bootleg corroborate hiss landowner liable northumberland padre permutation plagiarism ridicule saskatoon shrinkage showmen valparaiso versus\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}