{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"5d2b7f75-ceac-5598-80c2-e4654e50baaf","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--5d2b7f75-ceac-5598-80c2-e4654e50baaf","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: garter now stockbroker signet nucleus intervenor keynote numerology vanderpoel brainard forlorn fenugreek dwindle stripe wig perfidy shady deplore cornea\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"garter\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"now\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"stockbroker\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"signet\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"nucleus\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"intervenor\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"keynote\\\": \\\"k\\\" (11). \\\"numerology\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"vanderpoel\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"brainard\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"forlorn\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"fenugreek\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"dwindle\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"stripe\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"wig\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"perfidy\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"shady\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"deplore\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"cornea\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3).\\nThought 2: We now have: (2) \\\"brainard\\\" < (3) \\\"cornea\\\" < (4) [\\\"dwindle\\\" ? \\\"deplore\\\"] < (6) [\\\"fenugreek\\\" ? \\\"forlorn\\\"] < (7) \\\"garter\\\" < (9) \\\"intervenor\\\" < (11) \\\"keynote\\\" < (14) [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"now\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] < (16) \\\"perfidy\\\" < (19) [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] < (22) \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < (23) \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"dwindle\\\" ? \\\"deplore\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"dwindle\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"deplore\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 4: We now have: (4) \\\"deplore\\\" < (5) \\\"dwindle\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < [\\\"fenugreek\\\" ? \\\"forlorn\\\"] < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"now\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] < \\\"perfidy\\\" < [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"fenugreek\\\" ? \\\"forlorn\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"fenugreek\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"forlorn\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 6: We now have: (5) \\\"fenugreek\\\" < (15) \\\"forlorn\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < \\\"fenugreek\\\" < \\\"forlorn\\\" < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"now\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] < \\\"perfidy\\\" < [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"now\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"nucleus\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"now\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"numerology\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 8: We now have: (15) \\\"now\\\" < (21) [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < \\\"fenugreek\\\" < \\\"forlorn\\\" < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < \\\"now\\\" < [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] < \\\"perfidy\\\" < [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"nucleus\\\" ? \\\"numerology\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"nucleus\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"numerology\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13).\\nThought 10: We now have: (3) \\\"nucleus\\\" < (13) \\\"numerology\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < \\\"fenugreek\\\" < \\\"forlorn\\\" < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < \\\"now\\\" < \\\"nucleus\\\" < \\\"numerology\\\" < \\\"perfidy\\\" < [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\" ? \\\"signet\\\" ? \\\"shady\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"stripe\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"stockbroker\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"signet\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"shady\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8).\\nThought 12: We now have: (8) \\\"shady\\\" < (9) \\\"signet\\\" < (20) [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < \\\"fenugreek\\\" < \\\"forlorn\\\" < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < \\\"now\\\" < \\\"nucleus\\\" < \\\"numerology\\\" < \\\"perfidy\\\" < \\\"shady\\\" < \\\"signet\\\" < [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\"] < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 13: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"stripe\\\" ? \\\"stockbroker\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"stripe\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"stockbroker\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 14: We now have: (15) \\\"stockbroker\\\" < (18) \\\"stripe\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"brainard\\\" < \\\"cornea\\\" < \\\"deplore\\\" < \\\"dwindle\\\" < \\\"fenugreek\\\" < \\\"forlorn\\\" < \\\"garter\\\" < \\\"intervenor\\\" < \\\"keynote\\\" < \\\"now\\\" < \\\"nucleus\\\" < \\\"numerology\\\" < \\\"perfidy\\\" < \\\"shady\\\" < \\\"signet\\\" < \\\"stockbroker\\\" < \\\"stripe\\\" < \\\"vanderpoel\\\" < \\\"wig\\\".\\nThought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is brainard cornea deplore dwindle fenugreek forlorn garter intervenor keynote numerology nucleus now perfidy shady signet stockbroker stripe vanderpoel wig\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}