{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"musr","formal_name":"MuSR","introduction":"MuSR poses multistep soft reasoning problems over algorithmically generated narratives. It has three domains — murder mysteries, object placements and team allocation — and this catalogue imports all three domains, 756 problems in total.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"65b76773-351f-589e-a39f-9c0c759439ab","task_key":"default--team~5fallocation--65b76773-351f-589e-a39f-9c0c759439ab","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…","config":"default","split":"team_allocation","body":"{\"choices\":\"['AI development: Sandra, Business development: Alice and Tom', 'AI development: Alice, Business development: Sandra and Tom', 'AI development: Tom, Business development: Alice and Sandra']\",\"narrative\":\"In the dynamic sphere of artificial intelligence, where every thought could be a game-changer, I found myself at the helm of a distinctive trio at our AI startup: Alice, Tom, and Sandra. Each one a distinct powerhouse, armed with talents and traits that could potentially propel our ventures to unprecedented heights. My task was to decipher their individual strengths and align them with the ideal roles: AI Development and Business Development.\\n\\nAlice, the unceasing whirlwind of ideas and innovations, was truly an asset. Her mind, a labyrinth of AI models, could traverse pathways that others struggled to see. These ideations had led her to her crowning glory: the successful implementation of a machine learning model that soared our flagship project to new altitudes. But amidst this triumphant march, I noted the sparks between Alice and Tom, a tangle of unagreeable perspectives that often left Alice feeling sidelined and unheard.\\n\\nIt wasn't simply technical prowess Alice brought to the table, her words were charismatic, and the clients felt it too. Confidence permeated through her as she engaged with clients, discerning their hidden needs, a skill that had recently clinched us a valuable partnership with a trailblazing software company. But beneath this glistening veneer lay some strained relationships - her dynamic with Sandra. Alice had the habit of deeming Sandra slow and often took it upon herself to complete tasks that were originally assigned to Sandra.\\n\\nAnd then there was Sandra, the behind-the-scenes star. While Alice sparkled in the limelight, Sandra diligently sought guidance from senior engineers, soaking in their knowledge like a sponge. Her commitment to the craft was evident in her late hours spent reviewing the latest in AI literature. Yet, she felt underappreciated, particularly by Alice, who she believed was controlling and didn't let her prove her worth.\\n\\nWhere she wasn't always at the forefront of AI implementation, Sandra shone in understanding our customers. She laudably gathered their feedback, harnessing it to enhance user experience. A clear communicator, she led monthly webinars, her structured presentation catching the eyes of potential clients. But her journey wasn't devoid of hurdles. Her ask for guidance often met with dismissive or unhelpful advice from Tom, a blow to her confidence.\\n\\nAnd finally, we come to Tom. Unlike his female colleagues, his interest in AI was noticeably absent, a story that dated back to his college struggles in the world of artificial intelligence. However, he found his footing in the realm of customer interaction. His engaging conversations earned us a small project recently. His tenacity though often veered into rudeness, as he regularly dismissed Sandra's thoughts during meetings.\\n\\nAssigning each to a path where their potential could unfold was my impending challenge: To have them thrive, grow and move forward in the realm of AI Development and Business Development. A choice of harmony, growth and success or of conflicts, stagnation and failures lies ahead. It is as if I stand on the edge of a algorithms maze, ready to weave my way through. The narratives of Alice, Tom and Sandra intermingled erratic, yet forming the vivacious tapestry that holds our startup together. The decision ahead carried the loftiness of their ambitions and the future of our endeavors.\",\"question\":\"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}