{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"66002813-78e4-5135-9220-40c0210fc932","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--66002813-78e4-5135-9220-40c0210fc932","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: skate obsessive blew greene cardboard elliptic alchemist suffocate suck truckload incompetent scuba vagary arboreal cutset bernoulli expectorant\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"skate\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"obsessive\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"blew\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"greene\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"cardboard\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"elliptic\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"alchemist\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"suffocate\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"suck\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"truckload\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"incompetent\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"scuba\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"vagary\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"arboreal\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cutset\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"bernoulli\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"expectorant\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"alchemist\\\" ? \\\"arboreal\\\"] < (2) [\\\"blew\\\" ? \\\"bernoulli\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cardboard\\\" ? \\\"cutset\\\"] < (5) [\\\"elliptic\\\" ? \\\"expectorant\\\"] < (7) \\\"greene\\\" < (9) \\\"incompetent\\\" < (15) \\\"obsessive\\\" < (19) [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] < (20) \\\"truckload\\\" < (22) \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"alchemist\\\" ? \\\"arboreal\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"alchemist\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"arboreal\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 4: We now have: (3) \\\"alchemist\\\" < (18) \\\"arboreal\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alchemist\\\" < \\\"arboreal\\\" < [\\\"blew\\\" ? \\\"bernoulli\\\"] < [\\\"cardboard\\\" ? \\\"cutset\\\"] < [\\\"elliptic\\\" ? \\\"expectorant\\\"] < \\\"greene\\\" < \\\"incompetent\\\" < \\\"obsessive\\\" < [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] < \\\"truckload\\\" < \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"blew\\\" ? \\\"bernoulli\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"blew\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"bernoulli\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 6: We now have: (5) \\\"bernoulli\\\" < (12) \\\"blew\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alchemist\\\" < \\\"arboreal\\\" < \\\"bernoulli\\\" < \\\"blew\\\" < [\\\"cardboard\\\" ? \\\"cutset\\\"] < [\\\"elliptic\\\" ? \\\"expectorant\\\"] < \\\"greene\\\" < \\\"incompetent\\\" < \\\"obsessive\\\" < [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] < \\\"truckload\\\" < \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cardboard\\\" ? \\\"cutset\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"cardboard\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cutset\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"cardboard\\\" < (21) \\\"cutset\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alchemist\\\" < \\\"arboreal\\\" < \\\"bernoulli\\\" < \\\"blew\\\" < \\\"cardboard\\\" < \\\"cutset\\\" < [\\\"elliptic\\\" ? \\\"expectorant\\\"] < \\\"greene\\\" < \\\"incompetent\\\" < \\\"obsessive\\\" < [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] < \\\"truckload\\\" < \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"elliptic\\\" ? \\\"expectorant\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"elliptic\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"expectorant\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16).\\nThought 10: We now have: (12) \\\"elliptic\\\" < (16) \\\"expectorant\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alchemist\\\" < \\\"arboreal\\\" < \\\"bernoulli\\\" < \\\"blew\\\" < \\\"cardboard\\\" < \\\"cutset\\\" < \\\"elliptic\\\" < \\\"expectorant\\\" < \\\"greene\\\" < \\\"incompetent\\\" < \\\"obsessive\\\" < [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] < \\\"truckload\\\" < \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"skate\\\" ? \\\"scuba\\\" ? \\\"suck\\\" ? \\\"suffocate\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"skate\\\": \\\"k\\\" (11). \\\"scuba\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"suck\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"suffocate\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6).\\nThought 12: We now have: (3) \\\"scuba\\\" < (6) \\\"suffocate\\\" < (11) \\\"skate\\\" < (21) \\\"suck\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alchemist\\\" < \\\"arboreal\\\" < \\\"bernoulli\\\" < \\\"blew\\\" < \\\"cardboard\\\" < \\\"cutset\\\" < \\\"elliptic\\\" < \\\"expectorant\\\" < \\\"greene\\\" < \\\"incompetent\\\" < \\\"obsessive\\\" < \\\"scuba\\\" < \\\"suffocate\\\" < \\\"skate\\\" < \\\"suck\\\" < \\\"truckload\\\" < \\\"vagary\\\".\\nThought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is alchemist arboreal blew cardboard cutset elliptic expectorant greene incompetent obsessive scuba skate suck suffocate truckload vagary\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}