{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"76bb4dcd-2298-522b-954b-721772b2e621","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--76bb4dcd-2298-522b-954b-721772b2e621","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: balletomane brindisi mona secondhand blackstone effluvium beman swabby durward horse lament camille appetite mattock disputant\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"balletomane\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"brindisi\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"mona\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"secondhand\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"blackstone\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"effluvium\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"beman\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"swabby\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"durward\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"horse\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"lament\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"camille\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"appetite\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"mattock\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"disputant\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) \\\"appetite\\\" < (2) [\\\"balletomane\\\" ? \\\"brindisi\\\" ? \\\"blackstone\\\" ? \\\"beman\\\"] < (3) \\\"camille\\\" < (4) [\\\"durward\\\" ? \\\"disputant\\\"] < (5) \\\"effluvium\\\" < (8) \\\"horse\\\" < (12) \\\"lament\\\" < (13) [\\\"mona\\\" ? \\\"mattock\\\"] < (19) [\\\"secondhand\\\" ? \\\"swabby\\\"].\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"balletomane\\\" ? \\\"brindisi\\\" ? \\\"blackstone\\\" ? \\\"beman\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"balletomane\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"brindisi\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"blackstone\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"beman\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 4: We now have: (1) \\\"balletomane\\\" < (5) \\\"beman\\\" < (12) \\\"blackstone\\\" < (18) \\\"brindisi\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"appetite\\\" < \\\"balletomane\\\" < \\\"beman\\\" < \\\"camille\\\" < [\\\"durward\\\" ? \\\"disputant\\\"] < \\\"effluvium\\\" < \\\"horse\\\" < \\\"lament\\\" < [\\\"mona\\\" ? \\\"mattock\\\"] < [\\\"secondhand\\\" ? \\\"swabby\\\"].\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"durward\\\" ? \\\"disputant\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"durward\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"disputant\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 6: We now have: (9) \\\"disputant\\\" < (21) \\\"durward\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"appetite\\\" < \\\"balletomane\\\" < \\\"beman\\\" < \\\"camille\\\" < \\\"disputant\\\" < \\\"effluvium\\\" < \\\"horse\\\" < \\\"lament\\\" < [\\\"mona\\\" ? \\\"mattock\\\"] < [\\\"secondhand\\\" ? \\\"swabby\\\"] < \\\"durward\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"mona\\\" ? \\\"mattock\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"mona\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"mattock\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"mattock\\\" < (15) \\\"mona\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"appetite\\\" < \\\"balletomane\\\" < \\\"beman\\\" < \\\"camille\\\" < \\\"disputant\\\" < \\\"effluvium\\\" < \\\"horse\\\" < \\\"lament\\\" < \\\"mattock\\\" < [\\\"secondhand\\\" ? \\\"swabby\\\"] < \\\"durward\\\" < \\\"mona\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"secondhand\\\" ? \\\"swabby\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"secondhand\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"swabby\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23).\\nThought 10: We now have: (5) \\\"secondhand\\\" < (23) \\\"swabby\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"appetite\\\" < \\\"balletomane\\\" < \\\"beman\\\" < \\\"camille\\\" < \\\"disputant\\\" < \\\"effluvium\\\" < \\\"horse\\\" < \\\"lament\\\" < \\\"mattock\\\" < \\\"secondhand\\\" < \\\"swabby\\\" < \\\"durward\\\" < \\\"mona\\\".\\nThought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is appetite balletomane beman camille disputant effluvium horse lament mattock mona secondhand swabby durward\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}