{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"mmlu-pro","formal_name":"MMLU-Pro","introduction":"MMLU-Pro rebuilds MMLU with ten answer options instead of four and removes items that no longer separate models. Questions span fourteen academic and professional subjects.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"7f47ac85-7b7a-5087-ba78-b80efc7d320d","task_key":"default--test--1342","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"1342","short_description":"There is a thriving source of crawfish that live in a state. The state owns a…","config":"default","split":"test","body":"{\"category\":\"law\",\"options\":\"['unconstitutional, because it infringes on the rights of interstate commerce.', 'constitutional, because out-of-staters are not entitled to the same benefits as residents.', 'unconstitutional, because it is a form of discrimination against nonresidents.', 'constitutional, because the fee was a reasonable contribution toward the protection that the state government gave nonresidents.', 'unconstitutional, because it is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.', 'unconstitutional, because it constitutes a violation of the privileges and immunities clause under Article IV.', 'constitutional, because the state has the power to regulate its own resources.', \\\"constitutional, because the fee is a way to manage and protect the state's crawfish population.\\\", \\\"constitutional, because it is a valid exercise of the state's police power.\\\"]\",\"question\":\"There is a thriving source of crawfish that live in a state. The state owns a fleet of boats that trawl for crawfish. The state is willing to sell the crawfish to in-staters for $1 per pound and to out-of-staters who come to the state for $5 per pound. The state felt that the increased fee for out-of-staters was a reasonable contribution toward the protection they received from the state. Assume that the federal court decided to hear the case. The statute is likely to be found\",\"src\":\"ori_mmlu-professional_law\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}