{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"80efbd63-e9b5-59ff-bf94-9c3823fbc165","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--80efbd63-e9b5-59ff-bf94-9c3823fbc165","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: appliance addict cardiology nichrome rhesus you're worth merrimack sora dimorphism forfend degrease mallory inveigle cancer slivery informant rickets\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"appliance\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"addict\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cardiology\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"nichrome\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"rhesus\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"you're\\\": \\\"y\\\" (25). \\\"worth\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"merrimack\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"sora\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"dimorphism\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"forfend\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"degrease\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"mallory\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"inveigle\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"cancer\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"slivery\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"informant\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"rickets\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"addict\\\" ? \\\"appliance\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < (4) [\\\"degrease\\\" ? \\\"dimorphism\\\"] < (6) \\\"forfend\\\" < (9) [\\\"informant\\\" ? \\\"inveigle\\\"] < (13) [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] < (14) \\\"nichrome\\\" < (18) [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < (19) [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < (23) \\\"worth\\\" < (25) \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"addict\\\" ? \\\"appliance\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"addict\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"appliance\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16).\\nThought 4: We now have: (4) \\\"addict\\\" < (16) \\\"appliance\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < [\\\"degrease\\\" ? \\\"dimorphism\\\"] < \\\"forfend\\\" < [\\\"informant\\\" ? \\\"inveigle\\\"] < [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] < \\\"nichrome\\\" < [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"cardiology\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cancer\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < [\\\"degrease\\\" ? \\\"dimorphism\\\"] < \\\"forfend\\\" < [\\\"informant\\\" ? \\\"inveigle\\\"] < [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] < \\\"nichrome\\\" < [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"degrease\\\" ? \\\"dimorphism\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"degrease\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"dimorphism\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 8: We now have: (9) \\\"dimorphism\\\" < (18) \\\"degrease\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < \\\"dimorphism\\\" < \\\"degrease\\\" < \\\"forfend\\\" < [\\\"informant\\\" ? \\\"inveigle\\\"] < [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] < \\\"nichrome\\\" < [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"informant\\\" ? \\\"inveigle\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"informant\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"inveigle\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 10: We now have: (5) \\\"inveigle\\\" < (14) \\\"informant\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < \\\"dimorphism\\\" < \\\"degrease\\\" < \\\"forfend\\\" < \\\"inveigle\\\" < \\\"informant\\\" < [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] < \\\"nichrome\\\" < [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"mallory\\\" ? \\\"merrimack\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"mallory\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"merrimack\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 12: We now have: (1) \\\"mallory\\\" < (5) \\\"merrimack\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < \\\"dimorphism\\\" < \\\"degrease\\\" < \\\"forfend\\\" < \\\"inveigle\\\" < \\\"informant\\\" < \\\"mallory\\\" < \\\"merrimack\\\" < \\\"nichrome\\\" < [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 13: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"rhesus\\\" ? \\\"rickets\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"rhesus\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"rickets\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 14: We now have: (5) \\\"rhesus\\\" < (9) \\\"rickets\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < \\\"dimorphism\\\" < \\\"degrease\\\" < \\\"forfend\\\" < \\\"inveigle\\\" < \\\"informant\\\" < \\\"mallory\\\" < \\\"merrimack\\\" < \\\"nichrome\\\" < \\\"rhesus\\\" < \\\"rickets\\\" < [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 15: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"sora\\\" ? \\\"slivery\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"sora\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"slivery\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12).\\nThought 16: We now have: (12) \\\"slivery\\\" < (15) \\\"sora\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"addict\\\" < \\\"appliance\\\" < [\\\"cardiology\\\" ? \\\"cancer\\\"] < \\\"dimorphism\\\" < \\\"degrease\\\" < \\\"forfend\\\" < \\\"inveigle\\\" < \\\"informant\\\" < \\\"mallory\\\" < \\\"merrimack\\\" < \\\"nichrome\\\" < \\\"rhesus\\\" < \\\"rickets\\\" < \\\"slivery\\\" < \\\"sora\\\" < \\\"worth\\\" < \\\"you're\\\".\\nThought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is addict appliance cardiology cancer degrease dimorphism forfend informant inveigle mallory merrimack nichrome rhesus slivery rickets sora worth you're\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}