{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Hard","introduction":"BIG-Bench Hard is the set of 23 BIG-Bench tasks on which models of the time scored below the average human rater. It is best known for showing how much chain-of-thought prompting changes the result.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/suzgunmirac/BIG-Bench-Hard","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"89db5b19-ad17-5fc4-b241-28317e46a5ee","task_key":"formal~5ffallacies--main--89db5b19-ad17-5fc4-b241-28317e46a5ee","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"\"It is not always easy to see who is related to whom -- and in which ways. The…","config":"formal_fallacies","split":"main","body":"{\"input\":\"\\\"It is not always easy to see who is related to whom -- and in which ways. The following argument pertains to this question: First premise: Being a workmate of Monte is necessary for not being an ancestor of Patrick. Second premise: Not being an ancestor of Nathan is sufficient for not being a workmate of Monte. It follows that being an ancestor of Nathan is necessary for not being an ancestor of Patrick.\\\"\\nIs the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?\\nOptions:\\n- valid \\n- invalid\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/suzgunmirac/BIG-Bench-Hard","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}