{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"mmlu","formal_name":"MMLU","introduction":"MMLU asks four-way multiple-choice questions across 57 subjects, from elementary material to professional-level examinations. Since 2020 it has been the most widely cited single reference point for general capability.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/hendrycks/test","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"9372d66f-998c-5058-931c-5f893582bf8c","task_key":"all--test--9372d66f-998c-5058-931c-5f893582bf8c","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"A man wants to sell his bungalow for $10,000. His neighbor wants to buy it so he…","config":"all","split":"test","body":"{\"choices\":\"['No, the modification of the sales price was accepted and therefore both parties are bound to the $8000 price.', 'Yes, there was a lack of additional consideration under the pre-existing duty rule so that the modification was invalid and the original price was still valid.', 'No the original contract was a unilateral contract that could not be modified and had to be performed at the original price.', 'No, there was full performance of the contract.']\",\"question\":\"A man wants to sell his bungalow for $10,000. His neighbor wants to buy it so he can make his yard bigger and use the structure as a storage space, so he agrees to buy the bungalow in a written agreement. The sale is to be complete on October 14. On October 10, the neighbor realizes he cannot pay $10,000, and offers to pay $8,000 instead. The man agrees, and the exchange takes place on October 14. The man then sues for the remaining $2000. Would he likely prevail in getting the additional $2,000 that is part of the signed contract?\",\"subject\":\"professional_law\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/hendrycks/test","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}