{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"9488633c-bc24-5563-9612-aa8b18cc6d59","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--9488633c-bc24-5563-9612-aa8b18cc6d59","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: viennese hoagy conestoga anaphora heuser muscovy olivine buddy riboflavin exercise eukaryote october bonnie galley smoothbore weren't\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"viennese\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"hoagy\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"conestoga\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"anaphora\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"heuser\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"muscovy\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"olivine\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"buddy\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"riboflavin\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"exercise\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"eukaryote\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"october\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"bonnie\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"galley\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"smoothbore\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"weren't\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) \\\"anaphora\\\" < (2) [\\\"bonnie\\\" ? \\\"buddy\\\"] < (3) \\\"conestoga\\\" < (5) [\\\"exercise\\\" ? \\\"eukaryote\\\"] < (7) \\\"galley\\\" < (8) [\\\"hoagy\\\" ? \\\"heuser\\\"] < (13) \\\"muscovy\\\" < (15) [\\\"olivine\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < (18) \\\"riboflavin\\\" < (19) \\\"smoothbore\\\" < (22) \\\"viennese\\\" < (23) \\\"weren't\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"bonnie\\\" ? \\\"buddy\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"bonnie\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"buddy\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 4: We now have: (15) \\\"bonnie\\\" < (21) \\\"buddy\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"anaphora\\\" < \\\"bonnie\\\" < \\\"buddy\\\" < \\\"conestoga\\\" < [\\\"exercise\\\" ? \\\"eukaryote\\\"] < \\\"galley\\\" < [\\\"hoagy\\\" ? \\\"heuser\\\"] < \\\"muscovy\\\" < [\\\"olivine\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < \\\"riboflavin\\\" < \\\"smoothbore\\\" < \\\"viennese\\\" < \\\"weren't\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"exercise\\\" ? \\\"eukaryote\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"exercise\\\": \\\"x\\\" (24). \\\"eukaryote\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 6: We now have: (21) \\\"eukaryote\\\" < (24) \\\"exercise\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"anaphora\\\" < \\\"bonnie\\\" < \\\"buddy\\\" < \\\"conestoga\\\" < \\\"eukaryote\\\" < \\\"exercise\\\" < \\\"galley\\\" < [\\\"hoagy\\\" ? \\\"heuser\\\"] < \\\"muscovy\\\" < [\\\"olivine\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < \\\"riboflavin\\\" < \\\"smoothbore\\\" < \\\"viennese\\\" < \\\"weren't\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"hoagy\\\" ? \\\"heuser\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"hoagy\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"heuser\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"hoagy\\\" < (5) \\\"heuser\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"anaphora\\\" < \\\"bonnie\\\" < \\\"buddy\\\" < \\\"conestoga\\\" < \\\"eukaryote\\\" < \\\"exercise\\\" < \\\"galley\\\" < \\\"hoagy\\\" < \\\"heuser\\\" < \\\"muscovy\\\" < [\\\"olivine\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] < \\\"riboflavin\\\" < \\\"smoothbore\\\" < \\\"viennese\\\" < \\\"weren't\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"olivine\\\" ? \\\"october\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"olivine\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"october\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3).\\nThought 10: We now have: (3) \\\"october\\\" < (12) \\\"olivine\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"anaphora\\\" < \\\"bonnie\\\" < \\\"buddy\\\" < \\\"conestoga\\\" < \\\"eukaryote\\\" < \\\"exercise\\\" < \\\"galley\\\" < \\\"hoagy\\\" < \\\"heuser\\\" < \\\"muscovy\\\" < \\\"october\\\" < \\\"olivine\\\" < \\\"riboflavin\\\" < \\\"smoothbore\\\" < \\\"viennese\\\" < \\\"weren't\\\".\\nThought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is anaphora buddy bonnie conestoga eukaryote exercise galley hoagy heuser muscovy october olivine riboflavin smoothbore viennese weren't\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}