{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"musr","formal_name":"MuSR","introduction":"MuSR poses multistep soft reasoning problems over algorithmically generated narratives. It has three domains — murder mysteries, object placements and team allocation — and this catalogue imports all three domains, 756 problems in total.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"9857b332-3fb1-5303-98cc-1b836529617a","task_key":"default--team~5fallocation--9857b332-3fb1-5303-98cc-1b836529617a","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…","config":"default","split":"team_allocation","body":"{\"choices\":\"['Handling Cases: Michael, Conducting Legal Research: Alex and Madison', 'Handling Cases: Madison, Conducting Legal Research: Alex and Michael', 'Handling Cases: Alex, Conducting Legal Research: Madison and Michael']\",\"narrative\":\"In the vibrant epicenter of the city, where the pulse is the rustle of paperwork and the rhythmic tapping of countless keyboards, stood a renowned law firm. The pulse was set to quicken, as I faced a pivotal task: to strategically delegate the roles of handling cases and conducting legal research among a team of skilled lawyers. The key players in this intricate game were the fervent Alex, the steadfast Madison, and the self-reliant Michael.\\n\\nAlex was always an enigma, brimming with earnest desire, but weighed down by the gravity of legal minutiae. He had a penchant for diving deep into the legal and procedural world, a world that he often found himself lost in. His past included a notable incident of neglecting to file critical case documents, shining light onto a pressing issue with case management. Additionally, he battled constant struggles with the gargantuan workloads this firm inevitably brought. \\n\\nOften, he would find himself at loggerheads with the resolute Michael, over core disagreements about how best to handle cases. From an outsider's view, it seemed like Alex was shadowboxing, caught up in an endless loop despite proven strategies by Michael. However, it was not all doom and gloom for Alex. He found solace in Madison, someone whom he distinctly respected, often diving into profound intellectual discussions with her about case law analysis.\\n\\nThen we had Madison, a brilliant mind, a savvy lawyer with an uncanny knack for precision. She was the epitome of legal prowess; she possessed an exceptional understanding of law entwined with the ability to apply it in the most effective way. She was a law virtuoso. Many times, she fiercely defended major clients in high-profile cases, showcasing her prowess to the world. Madison also had an eye for detail in legal research where she often produced stellar works well-regarded for their precision and detail. However, her working relationship with Michael seemed to brew a storm of discontentment. She held the belief that Michael continually devalued her input during discussions.\\n\\nOn the other side of this trio stood the lone wolf, Michael. Michael took an approach to legal work that was remarkably different from his colleagues. He relished the solitude of independently working on his cases rather than investing his energy in team pursuits. His past bore testimony to his success in representing clients, even in minor cases. His activities slightly skewed towards legal research, even during his case preparation time, allowing him to unearth useful precedents for recent cases. His relations appeared strained though. Madison’s demanding nature seemed to oppose his independent approach to things; adding a strain in existing undertones.\\n\\nThese adroit lawyers each held a unique piece of the puzzle, essential to the functionality of the firm. The task I had at hand was to ensure that this puzzle became a picture of harmony, working at its peak potential. It would require understanding their respective strengths and abilities and deploying them tactfully, in areas where they could flourish. As the ticking of a thousand keyboards continued, the firm's faith lay in my choices.\",\"question\":\"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}