{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"99d1016c-ad95-58af-90b0-eada74289dd7","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--99d1016c-ad95-58af-90b0-eada74289dd7","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: slav exonerate empathic grad firm deface missionary turbidity sculpt hornblower blanch velocity shell inexplainable bmw nickname patrick ingredient\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"slav\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"exonerate\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"empathic\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"grad\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"firm\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"deface\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"missionary\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"turbidity\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"sculpt\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"hornblower\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"blanch\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"velocity\\\": \\\"v\\\" (22). \\\"shell\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"inexplainable\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"bmw\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"nickname\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"patrick\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"ingredient\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 2: We now have: (2) [\\\"bmw\\\" ? \\\"blanch\\\"] < (4) \\\"deface\\\" < (5) [\\\"empathic\\\" ? \\\"exonerate\\\"] < (6) \\\"firm\\\" < (7) \\\"grad\\\" < (8) \\\"hornblower\\\" < (9) [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] < (13) \\\"missionary\\\" < (14) \\\"nickname\\\" < (16) \\\"patrick\\\" < (19) [\\\"sculpt\\\" ? \\\"shell\\\" ? \\\"slav\\\"] < (20) \\\"turbidity\\\" < (22) \\\"velocity\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"bmw\\\" ? \\\"blanch\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"bmw\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"blanch\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12).\\nThought 4: We now have: (12) \\\"blanch\\\" < (13) \\\"bmw\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"blanch\\\" < \\\"bmw\\\" < \\\"deface\\\" < [\\\"empathic\\\" ? \\\"exonerate\\\"] < \\\"firm\\\" < \\\"grad\\\" < \\\"hornblower\\\" < [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] < \\\"missionary\\\" < \\\"nickname\\\" < \\\"patrick\\\" < [\\\"sculpt\\\" ? \\\"shell\\\" ? \\\"slav\\\"] < \\\"turbidity\\\" < \\\"velocity\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"empathic\\\" ? \\\"exonerate\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"empathic\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"exonerate\\\": \\\"x\\\" (24).\\nThought 6: We now have: (13) \\\"empathic\\\" < (24) \\\"exonerate\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"blanch\\\" < \\\"bmw\\\" < \\\"deface\\\" < \\\"empathic\\\" < \\\"exonerate\\\" < \\\"firm\\\" < \\\"grad\\\" < \\\"hornblower\\\" < [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] < \\\"missionary\\\" < \\\"nickname\\\" < \\\"patrick\\\" < [\\\"sculpt\\\" ? \\\"shell\\\" ? \\\"slav\\\"] < \\\"turbidity\\\" < \\\"velocity\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"ingredient\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"inexplainable\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14).\\nThought 8: We now have: (14) [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"blanch\\\" < \\\"bmw\\\" < \\\"deface\\\" < \\\"empathic\\\" < \\\"exonerate\\\" < \\\"firm\\\" < \\\"grad\\\" < \\\"hornblower\\\" < [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] < \\\"missionary\\\" < \\\"nickname\\\" < \\\"patrick\\\" < [\\\"sculpt\\\" ? \\\"shell\\\" ? \\\"slav\\\"] < \\\"turbidity\\\" < \\\"velocity\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"sculpt\\\" ? \\\"shell\\\" ? \\\"slav\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"sculpt\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"shell\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"slav\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12).\\nThought 10: We now have: (3) \\\"sculpt\\\" < (8) \\\"shell\\\" < (12) \\\"slav\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"blanch\\\" < \\\"bmw\\\" < \\\"deface\\\" < \\\"empathic\\\" < \\\"exonerate\\\" < \\\"firm\\\" < \\\"grad\\\" < \\\"hornblower\\\" < [\\\"ingredient\\\" ? \\\"inexplainable\\\"] < \\\"missionary\\\" < \\\"nickname\\\" < \\\"patrick\\\" < \\\"sculpt\\\" < \\\"shell\\\" < \\\"slav\\\" < \\\"turbidity\\\" < \\\"velocity\\\".\\nThought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is blanch bmw deface empathic exonerate firm grad hornblower ingredient inexplainable missionary nickname patrick sculpt shell slav turbidity velocity\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}