{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"a4645257-aa77-5aa3-ae8b-d07abc3a6749","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--a4645257-aa77-5aa3-ae8b-d07abc3a6749","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: wineskin determinate innocuous neglect gentry cain pigging subvert slim cognoscenti equilibrate mcginnis alacrity fletcher oatcake diagnostic segregant autoclave aerofoil\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"wineskin\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"determinate\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"innocuous\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"neglect\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"gentry\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"cain\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"pigging\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"subvert\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"slim\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"cognoscenti\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"equilibrate\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"mcginnis\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"alacrity\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"fletcher\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"oatcake\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"diagnostic\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"segregant\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"autoclave\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"aerofoil\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\" ? \\\"aerofoil\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cain\\\" ? \\\"cognoscenti\\\"] < (4) [\\\"determinate\\\" ? \\\"diagnostic\\\"] < (5) \\\"equilibrate\\\" < (6) \\\"fletcher\\\" < (7) \\\"gentry\\\" < (9) \\\"innocuous\\\" < (13) \\\"mcginnis\\\" < (14) \\\"neglect\\\" < (15) \\\"oatcake\\\" < (16) \\\"pigging\\\" < (19) [\\\"slim\\\" ? \\\"segregant\\\" ? \\\"subvert\\\"] < (23) \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\" ? \\\"aerofoil\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"alacrity\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"autoclave\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"aerofoil\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 4: We now have: (5) \\\"aerofoil\\\" < (12) \\\"alacrity\\\" < (21) \\\"autoclave\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"aerofoil\\\" ? \\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\"] < [\\\"cain\\\" ? \\\"cognoscenti\\\"] < [\\\"determinate\\\" ? \\\"diagnostic\\\"] < \\\"equilibrate\\\" < \\\"fletcher\\\" < \\\"gentry\\\" < \\\"innocuous\\\" < \\\"mcginnis\\\" < \\\"neglect\\\" < \\\"oatcake\\\" < \\\"pigging\\\" < [\\\"slim\\\" ? \\\"segregant\\\" ? \\\"subvert\\\"] < \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cain\\\" ? \\\"cognoscenti\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"cain\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"cognoscenti\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) \\\"cain\\\" < (15) \\\"cognoscenti\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"aerofoil\\\" ? \\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\"] < \\\"cain\\\" < \\\"cognoscenti\\\" < [\\\"determinate\\\" ? \\\"diagnostic\\\"] < \\\"equilibrate\\\" < \\\"fletcher\\\" < \\\"gentry\\\" < \\\"innocuous\\\" < \\\"mcginnis\\\" < \\\"neglect\\\" < \\\"oatcake\\\" < \\\"pigging\\\" < [\\\"slim\\\" ? \\\"segregant\\\" ? \\\"subvert\\\"] < \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"determinate\\\" ? \\\"diagnostic\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"determinate\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"diagnostic\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9).\\nThought 8: We now have: (5) \\\"determinate\\\" < (9) \\\"diagnostic\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"aerofoil\\\" ? \\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\"] < \\\"cain\\\" < \\\"cognoscenti\\\" < \\\"determinate\\\" < \\\"diagnostic\\\" < \\\"equilibrate\\\" < \\\"fletcher\\\" < \\\"gentry\\\" < \\\"innocuous\\\" < \\\"mcginnis\\\" < \\\"neglect\\\" < \\\"oatcake\\\" < \\\"pigging\\\" < [\\\"slim\\\" ? \\\"segregant\\\" ? \\\"subvert\\\"] < \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"slim\\\" ? \\\"segregant\\\" ? \\\"subvert\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"slim\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"segregant\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"subvert\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21).\\nThought 10: We now have: (5) \\\"segregant\\\" < (12) \\\"slim\\\" < (21) \\\"subvert\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"aerofoil\\\" ? \\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\"] < \\\"cain\\\" < \\\"cognoscenti\\\" < \\\"determinate\\\" < \\\"diagnostic\\\" < \\\"equilibrate\\\" < \\\"fletcher\\\" < \\\"gentry\\\" < \\\"innocuous\\\" < \\\"mcginnis\\\" < \\\"neglect\\\" < \\\"oatcake\\\" < \\\"pigging\\\" < \\\"segregant\\\" < \\\"slim\\\" < \\\"subvert\\\" < \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"aerofoil\\\" ? \\\"alacrity\\\" ? \\\"autoclave\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"aerofoil\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"alacrity\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"autoclave\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20).\\nThought 12: We now have: (3) \\\"alacrity\\\" < (18) \\\"aerofoil\\\" < (20) \\\"autoclave\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"alacrity\\\" < \\\"aerofoil\\\" < \\\"autoclave\\\" < \\\"cain\\\" < \\\"cognoscenti\\\" < \\\"determinate\\\" < \\\"diagnostic\\\" < \\\"equilibrate\\\" < \\\"fletcher\\\" < \\\"gentry\\\" < \\\"innocuous\\\" < \\\"mcginnis\\\" < \\\"neglect\\\" < \\\"oatcake\\\" < \\\"pigging\\\" < \\\"segregant\\\" < \\\"slim\\\" < \\\"subvert\\\" < \\\"wineskin\\\".\\nThought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is alacrity aerofoil autoclave cain cognoscenti determinate diagnostic equilibrate fletcher gentry innocuous mcginnis neglect oatcake pigging segregant slim subvert wineskin\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}