{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Hard","introduction":"BIG-Bench Hard is the set of 23 BIG-Bench tasks on which models of the time scored below the average human rater. It is best known for showing how much chain-of-thought prompting changes the result.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/suzgunmirac/BIG-Bench-Hard","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"a5d8eea1-b9a6-593f-906a-ea21a25aab7d","task_key":"formal~5ffallacies--main--a5d8eea1-b9a6-593f-906a-ea21a25aab7d","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"\"It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following…","config":"formal_fallacies","split":"main","body":"{\"input\":\"\\\"It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following argument pertains to this question: To begin with, being an owner of a Nag Champa soap is sufficient for being a rare consumer of KMS shampoo. Moreover, every rare consumer of KMS shampoo is not a loyal buyer of Schwarzkopf shampoo or not an owner of a Lush soap. It follows that every owner of a Nag Champa soap is an owner of a Lush soap and a loyal buyer of Schwarzkopf shampoo.\\\"\\nIs the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?\\nOptions:\\n- valid \\n- invalid\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/suzgunmirac/BIG-Bench-Hard","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}