{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"b6901aa6-e47e-5727-9259-d39cb0944021","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--b6901aa6-e47e-5727-9259-d39cb0944021","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: obtrude nearsighted urea accession advice chiefdom athlete caudal affront levulose did node goblet actress fetid any public wheller jordan conspiratorial\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"obtrude\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"nearsighted\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"urea\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"accession\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"advice\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"chiefdom\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"athlete\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"caudal\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"affront\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"levulose\\\": \\\"l\\\" (12). \\\"did\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"node\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"goblet\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"actress\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"fetid\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"any\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"public\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"wheller\\\": \\\"w\\\" (23). \\\"jordan\\\": \\\"j\\\" (10). \\\"conspiratorial\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3).\\nThought 2: We now have: (1) [\\\"accession\\\" ? \\\"advice\\\" ? \\\"actress\\\" ? \\\"any\\\" ? \\\"affront\\\" ? \\\"athlete\\\" ? \\\"chiefdom\\\"] < (3) [\\\"caudal\\\" ? \\\"conspiratorial\\\"] < (4) \\\"did\\\" < (6) \\\"fetid\\\" < (7) \\\"goblet\\\" < (10) \\\"jordan\\\" < (12) \\\"levulose\\\" < (14) [\\\"nearsighted\\\" ? \\\"node\\\"] < (15) \\\"obtrude\\\" < (16) \\\"public\\\" < (21) \\\"urea\\\" < (23) \\\"wheller\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"accession\\\" ? \\\"advice\\\" ? \\\"actress\\\" ? \\\"any\\\" ? \\\"affront\\\" ? \\\"athlete\\\" ? \\\"chiefdom\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"accession\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"advice\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"actress\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"any\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"affront\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"athlete\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"chiefdom\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8).\\nThought 4: We now have: (3) [\\\"accession\\\" ? \\\"actress\\\" ? \\\"chiefdom\\\"] < (4) \\\"advice\\\" < (6) \\\"affront\\\" < (8) \\\"chiefdom\\\" < (14) \\\"any\\\" < (20) \\\"athlete\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"accession\\\" ? \\\"actress\\\" ? \\\"chiefdom\\\"] < \\\"advice\\\" < \\\"affront\\\" < \\\"chiefdom\\\" < \\\"any\\\" < \\\"athlete\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"accession\\\" ? \\\"actress\\\" ? \\\"chiefdom\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"accession\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"actress\\\": \\\"t\\\" (20). \\\"chiefdom\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5).\\nThought 6: We now have: (3) \\\"accession\\\" < (5) \\\"chiefdom\\\" < (20) \\\"actress\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"accession\\\" < \\\"chiefdom\\\" < \\\"actress\\\" < \\\"advice\\\" < \\\"affront\\\" < \\\"chiefdom\\\" < \\\"any\\\" < \\\"athlete\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"caudal\\\" ? \\\"conspiratorial\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"caudal\\\": \\\"u\\\" (21). \\\"conspiratorial\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 8: We now have: (15) \\\"conspiratorial\\\" < (21) \\\"caudal\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"conspiratorial\\\" < \\\"caudal\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"nearsighted\\\" ? \\\"node\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"nearsighted\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"node\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 10: We now have: (5) \\\"nearsighted\\\" < (15) \\\"node\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have \\\"nearsighted\\\" < \\\"node\\\".\\nThought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is accession advice affront any athlete caudal chiefdom conspiratorial did fetid goblet jordan levulose nearsighted node obtrude public urea wheller\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}