{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"mmlu-pro","formal_name":"MMLU-Pro","introduction":"MMLU-Pro rebuilds MMLU with ten answer options instead of four and removes items that no longer separate models. Questions span fourteen academic and professional subjects.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"c70d348e-b930-52b5-8931-974c64309773","task_key":"default--test--10927","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"10927","short_description":"Which of the following fallacies is a way of suppressing evidence that…","config":"default","split":"test","body":"{\"category\":\"philosophy\",\"options\":\"['straw man', 'snob appeal', 'bandwagon fallacy', 'appeal to anonymous authority', 'false dilemma', 'significance', 'appeal to ignorance', 'argumentum ad populum', 'poisoning the well', 'cherry picking']\",\"question\":\"Which of the following fallacies is a way of suppressing evidence that eliminates a source of evidence from consideration by claiming the source is flawed, when there is no true relationship between the alleged flaw and the reliability of the source?\",\"src\":\"ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}