{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"mmlu","formal_name":"MMLU","introduction":"MMLU asks four-way multiple-choice questions across 57 subjects, from elementary material to professional-level examinations. Since 2020 it has been the most widely cited single reference point for general capability.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/hendrycks/test","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"c79bd147-462f-5720-b6ac-3ea91a8f411d","task_key":"all--test--c79bd147-462f-5720-b6ac-3ea91a8f411d","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"A criminal defendant was convicted at a jury trial of several counts of fraud.…","config":"all","split":"test","body":"{\"choices\":\"['No, sentencing laws widely authorize the sentencing court to engage in fact-finding that is based on a preponderance of the evidence.', 'No, it has never been decided that a defendant has a right to be judged on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.', \\\"Yes, judicial fact-finding that increases the maximum sentence over what the jury's verdict allows is unconstitutional.\\\", \\\"Yes, it is unconstitutional for a court to use its discretion to fashioning a defendant's sentence.\\\"]\",\"question\":\"A criminal defendant was convicted at a jury trial of several counts of fraud. At sentencing the court made additional factual findings, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that resulted in the addition of a 10-year enhancement to the sentence, which was over and above the maximum provided for by the jury's verdict. Defense counsel objected that the judge-made enhancement was unconstitutional and denied his right to a jury trial on that issue. Does counsel have a valid constitutional argument?\",\"subject\":\"professional_law\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/hendrycks/test","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}