{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"d1305d73-7e99-51ca-8e46-801c69c0c991","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--d1305d73-7e99-51ca-8e46-801c69c0c991","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: grammarian chivalry polkadot gastronomic ferocity brenda knutson endothelial phenotype irreducible bilinear rockaway derivate eaten cacao scurrilous\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"grammarian\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"chivalry\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"polkadot\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"gastronomic\\\": \\\"g\\\" (7). \\\"ferocity\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"brenda\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"knutson\\\": \\\"k\\\" (11). \\\"endothelial\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"phenotype\\\": \\\"p\\\" (16). \\\"irreducible\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"bilinear\\\": \\\"b\\\" (2). \\\"rockaway\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18). \\\"derivate\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"eaten\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"cacao\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"scurrilous\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19).\\nThought 2: We now have: (2) [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < (3) [\\\"cacao\\\" ? \\\"chivalry\\\"] < (4) \\\"derivate\\\" < (5) [\\\"endothelial\\\" ? \\\"eaten\\\"] < (6) \\\"ferocity\\\" < (7) [\\\"gastronomic\\\" ? \\\"grammarian\\\"] < (9) \\\"irreducible\\\" < (11) \\\"knutson\\\" < (16) [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] < (18) \\\"rockaway\\\" < (19) \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"bilinear\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"brenda\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 4: We now have: (9) \\\"bilinear\\\" < (18) \\\"brenda\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < [\\\"cacao\\\" ? \\\"chivalry\\\"] < \\\"derivate\\\" < [\\\"endothelial\\\" ? \\\"eaten\\\"] < \\\"ferocity\\\" < [\\\"gastronomic\\\" ? \\\"grammarian\\\"] < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"cacao\\\" ? \\\"chivalry\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"cacao\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"chivalry\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8).\\nThought 6: We now have: (1) \\\"cacao\\\" < (8) \\\"chivalry\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < \\\"cacao\\\" < \\\"chivalry\\\" < \\\"derivate\\\" < [\\\"endothelial\\\" ? \\\"eaten\\\"] < \\\"ferocity\\\" < [\\\"gastronomic\\\" ? \\\"grammarian\\\"] < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"endothelial\\\" ? \\\"eaten\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"endothelial\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"eaten\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 8: We now have: (1) \\\"eaten\\\" < (14) \\\"endothelial\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < \\\"cacao\\\" < \\\"chivalry\\\" < \\\"derivate\\\" < \\\"eaten\\\" < \\\"endothelial\\\" < \\\"ferocity\\\" < [\\\"gastronomic\\\" ? \\\"grammarian\\\"] < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"gastronomic\\\" ? \\\"grammarian\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"gastronomic\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"grammarian\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 10: We now have: (1) \\\"gastronomic\\\" < (18) \\\"grammarian\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < \\\"cacao\\\" < \\\"chivalry\\\" < \\\"derivate\\\" < \\\"eaten\\\" < \\\"endothelial\\\" < \\\"ferocity\\\" < \\\"gastronomic\\\" < \\\"grammarian\\\" < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"phenotype\\\" ? \\\"polkadot\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"phenotype\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"polkadot\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 12: We now have: (5) \\\"phenotype\\\" < (15) \\\"polkadot\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < \\\"cacao\\\" < \\\"chivalry\\\" < \\\"derivate\\\" < \\\"eaten\\\" < \\\"endothelial\\\" < \\\"ferocity\\\" < \\\"gastronomic\\\" < \\\"grammarian\\\" < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < \\\"phenotype\\\" < \\\"polkadot\\\" < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 13: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"bilinear\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"brenda\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14).\\nThought 14: We now have: (14) [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"bilinear\\\" ? \\\"brenda\\\"] < \\\"cacao\\\" < \\\"chivalry\\\" < \\\"derivate\\\" < \\\"eaten\\\" < \\\"endothelial\\\" < \\\"ferocity\\\" < \\\"gastronomic\\\" < \\\"grammarian\\\" < \\\"irreducible\\\" < \\\"knutson\\\" < \\\"phenotype\\\" < \\\"polkadot\\\" < \\\"rockaway\\\" < \\\"scurrilous\\\".\\nThought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is bilinear brenda cacao chivalry derivate eaten endothelial ferocity gastronomic grammarian irreducible knutson phenotype polkadot rockaway scurrilous\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}