{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"musr","formal_name":"MuSR","introduction":"MuSR poses multistep soft reasoning problems over algorithmically generated narratives. It has three domains — murder mysteries, object placements and team allocation — and this catalogue imports all three domains, 756 problems in total.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"d6a80853-3908-56f4-a7d1-eed819920db9","task_key":"default--team~5fallocation--d6a80853-3908-56f4-a7d1-eed819920db9","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…","config":"default","split":"team_allocation","body":"{\"choices\":\"['Acting: Leo, Production Crew: Emily and Rachel', 'Acting: Emily, Production Crew: Leo and Rachel', 'Acting: Rachel, Production Crew: Emily and Leo']\",\"narrative\":\"In the heart of Hollywood's vibrant scene, a studio was built on the unique abilities of three extraordinary individuals: Rachel, Leo, and Emily. Longtime friends, they were entrusted with a significant task by the director of an upcoming film. The challenge was to wisely assign each of them to one of two critical roles: acting or the production crew.\\n\\nOur trio was made up of three imaginative spirits: the boisterous Leo, the disciplined Rachel, and the effervescent Emily. Rachel, an actor by nature, often faced minor contention with Emily due to her strict ways, which Emily felt left little room for the creative spontaneity often needed during the acting process. Yet, despite these conflicts, Emily had a penchant for acting, frequently attending acting classes and reading lines at her local drama club. She also boasted a resume which included minor roles in local theatre productions that had earned praise from critics. This didn’t deter Emily from occasionally dipping her toes in the realm of technical roles; she had once even replaced a missing sound engineer during a theatre rehearsal. Although the overall technicality of film production overwhelmed her slightly, Emily found solace in Leo's sporadic working style; there was a certain charm to his impromptu approach.\\n\\nLeo on the other hand was a rarity- a fusion of the worlds of acting and production. He had previously been an assistant director and been responsible for handling technical equipment on the field. When he wasn't working, one could find Leo reading up on the latest filming techniques and equipment. Never one to shy away from the more theatrical side of the industry, Leo also had his fair share of acting experience. Like Rachel, he too had been lauded for his performances in short films and was an ardent participant of drama workshops. He found peace in practicing monologues at home and often helped Emily in scene preparation.\\n\\nRachel was quite the paradox to Leo's spontaneity as she appreciated having strategic plans. She had been the leading role in a local theatre production capturing the hearts of her audience with her expressions and received great acclamation for her dynamic performance. Rachel believes Emily's preparation lacks expediency, and sometimes impinges on the shooting schedule. Meanwhile, Rachel's acting acumen was not her only strong suit. She had interned for a small film project, making a student film as part of her college curriculum. While this experience gave Rachel a basic understanding of lighting and sound, her knowledge of shooting and editing was limited, without substantial hands-on experience in these areas.\\n\\nWorking in such close contact had its challenges. Rachel's precision clashed with Leo's spontaneity quite often. Each had their unique methods of working, hence, finding a middle ground could be arduous. Despite having drastically different work ethics, they found unity in their shared passion.\\n\\nAs the manager of this eclectic group, the only task more challenging than gearing them towards the same goal, was figuring out the ideal role for each in this ambitious project. The question was: who would step into the shoes of the actors, delivering emotional dialogues and making the audience laugh and cry and who would become the backbone of the production, will control the behind-the-scenes magic of lighting, sound, shooting, and editing? Only time would tell as the curtain rose on this cinematic endeavor.\\n\",\"question\":\"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}