{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"bbeh","formal_name":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH)","introduction":"BIG-Bench Extra Hard evaluates language-model reasoning through challenging task categories. It offers full and mini distributions; this import contains the full distribution: 4,520 questions across all 23 task categories.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"ddb638aa-4c92-52c2-aadb-02d4c7136b58","task_key":"bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--ddb638aa-4c92-52c2-aadb-02d4c7136b58","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…","config":"bbeh_word_sorting","split":"full","body":"{\"input\":\"\\nYou are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.\\nYour job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of\\nthe alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.\\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: conductor homomorphic impermissible inhere notice saxophone fray hypotheses etiquette squeegee condemnate diverse opinion sarong\\nThought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: \\\"conductor\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"homomorphic\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"impermissible\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"inhere\\\": \\\"i\\\" (9). \\\"notice\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"saxophone\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"fray\\\": \\\"f\\\" (6). \\\"hypotheses\\\": \\\"h\\\" (8). \\\"etiquette\\\": \\\"e\\\" (5). \\\"squeegee\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19). \\\"condemnate\\\": \\\"c\\\" (3). \\\"diverse\\\": \\\"d\\\" (4). \\\"opinion\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"sarong\\\": \\\"s\\\" (19).\\nThought 2: We now have: (3) [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) [\\\"hypotheses\\\" ? \\\"homomorphic\\\"] < (9) [\\\"impermissible\\\" ? \\\"inhere\\\"] < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"squeegee\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"].\\nThought 3: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"condemnate\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15). \\\"conductor\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 4: We now have: (15) [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) [\\\"hypotheses\\\" ? \\\"homomorphic\\\"] < (9) [\\\"impermissible\\\" ? \\\"inhere\\\"] < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"squeegee\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"].\\nThought 5: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"hypotheses\\\" ? \\\"homomorphic\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"hypotheses\\\": \\\"y\\\" (25). \\\"homomorphic\\\": \\\"o\\\" (15).\\nThought 6: We now have: (15) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (9) [\\\"impermissible\\\" ? \\\"inhere\\\"] < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"squeegee\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\".\\nThought 7: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"impermissible\\\" ? \\\"inhere\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"impermissible\\\": \\\"m\\\" (13). \\\"inhere\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14).\\nThought 8: We now have: (13) \\\"impermissible\\\" < (14) \\\"inhere\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (9) \\\"impermissible\\\" < (14) \\\"inhere\\\" < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"squeegee\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\".\\nThought 9: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"squeegee\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: \\\"saxophone\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1). \\\"squeegee\\\": \\\"q\\\" (17). \\\"sarong\\\": \\\"a\\\" (1).\\nThought 10: We now have: (1) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] < (17) \\\"squeegee\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (9) \\\"impermissible\\\" < (14) \\\"inhere\\\" < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] < (17) \\\"squeegee\\\" < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\".\\nThought 11: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"condemnate\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14). \\\"conductor\\\": \\\"n\\\" (14).\\nThought 12: We now have: (14) [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (9) \\\"impermissible\\\" < (14) \\\"inhere\\\" < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (19) [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] < (17) \\\"squeegee\\\" < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\".\\nThought 13: Now let's sort this subpart [\\\"saxophone\\\" ? \\\"sarong\\\"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: \\\"saxophone\\\": \\\"x\\\" (24). \\\"sarong\\\": \\\"r\\\" (18).\\nThought 14: We now have: (18) \\\"sarong\\\" < (24) \\\"saxophone\\\" for the subpart. Hence, we have [\\\"condemnate\\\" ? \\\"conductor\\\"] < (4) \\\"diverse\\\" < (5) \\\"etiquette\\\" < (6) \\\"fray\\\" < (8) \\\"homomorphic\\\" < (9) \\\"impermissible\\\" < (14) \\\"inhere\\\" < (14) \\\"notice\\\" < (15) \\\"opinion\\\" < (18) \\\"sarong\\\" < (17) \\\"squeegee\\\" < (24) \\\"saxophone\\\" < (25) \\\"hypotheses\\\".\\nThought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is condemnate conductor diverse etiquette fray hypotheses homomorphic impermissible inhere notice opinion saxophone sarong squeegee\\nQ: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write \\\"No\\\" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.\\n\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://github.com/google-deepmind/bbeh","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}