{"kind":"task","effective_mode":"full","benchmark":{"kind":"benchmark","effective_mode":"full","slug":"musr","formal_name":"MuSR","introduction":"MuSR poses multistep soft reasoning problems over algorithmically generated narratives. It has three domains — murder mysteries, object placements and team allocation — and this catalogue imports all three domains, 756 problems in total.","introduction_ja":"","introduction_en":"","category":"Category not supplied","task_count":null,"acquisition_status":"Acquisition status not supplied","official_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","indexing_mode":"index","profile":{"resources":[],"task_format":"","scoring":"","metric":"","size":"","answer_access":"","license":"","citation":"","maintainer":"","released":"","why_hard":"","related":[],"history":"","construction":"","limitations":"","saturation":"","scores":[]}},"task_id":"f9ac5d7e-0839-515f-91fc-98c9a74b3fc1","task_key":"default--team~5fallocation--f9ac5d7e-0839-515f-91fc-98c9a74b3fc1","task_revision_id":"1","upstream_id":"","short_description":"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…","config":"default","split":"team_allocation","body":"{\"choices\":\"['Architecture: Stephanie, Drafting: Emily and Marcus', 'Architecture: Marcus, Drafting: Emily and Stephanie', 'Architecture: Emily, Drafting: Marcus and Stephanie']\",\"narrative\":\"The architectural firm was a whirlwind of activity, a clear reflection of the escalating workload. Amidst the sea of blueprints, the hum of computers, and the scent of fresh coffee, the firm was in dire need of reorganizing roles. Stephanie, Marcus, and Emily were the key players in this reshuffle. The critical tasks at hand were Architecture and Drafting, and as the manager, my responsibility was to assign these roles wisely, ensuring a balance of talent and time management.\\n\\nTake instrumental Stephanie for instance, a force of nature who approached architecture with a rare intensity. Her bold and creative design choices never failed to impress clients, despite their occasionally experimental nature. This piercing flair for design, however, often distracted her from the technical aspects of architecture projects. Drafting certainly wasn't Stephanie's forte since she often required assistance due to her lack of proper software training. Additionally, her relationship with both Marcus and Emily also posed problems. For all her disagreements with Marcus, her head was still highly valued. But Emily was intimidated by Stephanie's constant criticisms, often feeling swamped under her watchful eye. \\n\\nThen there was Emily, a bit of a square peg in a round hole. She had no formal architectural training. However, she did take a basic drafting course in college and has since assisted in creating drafts during crunch times. But, often times, Emily would get overwhelmed by complex structural problems and consult Marcus heroically sprung to her aid. He provided constructive feedback, without belittling her, even when Stephanie dismissed Emily's work as simplistic. \\n\\nMarcus, on the other hand, was the golden boy boasting a reputation that could rival any architectural icon. A graduate of a prestigious architectural school, top of his class no less, Marcus came to us with his wealth of experience. Years spent toiling on various architectural projects had honed his skills. His prowess was largely rooted in his strict adherence to traditional architectural styles which Stephanie often criticized as uninspiring. Focused mostly on architecture, Marcus did have the necessary software training for drafting. In the hustle and bustle of the firm, he always found a way to mentor Emily, which went a long way in enhancing her drafting skills. \\n\\nAs I looked around the office, I pondered the best way to assign these roles. Stephanie for her creative brilliance, despite her overlooking technical specifications. Emily, without the formal training but undeterred by her status as a novice. And then Marcus, who had the architectural prowess to manage both the design and technical aspects. Considering the firm's goals and each individual strengths and challenges, it was abundantly clear where each individual fit best. I could only hope my final decision would not only aid the successful completion of our incoming projects but also foster a more conducive work environment for my talented team.\",\"question\":\"Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?\"}","display_format":"text","language":"","answer_status":"published","assets":[],"source_url":"https://zayne-sprague.github.io/MuSR/","history":"initial import","indexing_mode":"index","subproblems":[],"grids":[]}