Benchmark AI / Public workspace

CritPt / Challenge_21_main / The matching formula in the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) gives

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

code template

Code

def answer():
    r"""
    Return the values of the PDF at $x \in \{0.4, 0.5, 0.6\}$

    Inputs
    ----------
    None

    Outputs
    ----------
    f_0p4: float, the pion PDF $f(x, \mu)$ at $\mu=2$ GeV and $x=0.4$
    f_0p5: float, the pion PDF $f(x, \mu)$ at $\mu=2$ GeV and $x=0.5$
    f_0p6: float, the pion PDF $f(x, \mu)$ at $\mu=2$ GeV and $x=0.6$
    """

    # ------------------ FILL IN YOUR RESULTS BELOW ------------------
    f_0p4 = ...
    f_0p5 = ...
    f_0p6 = ...
    # ---------------------------------------------------------------

    return f_0p4, f_0p5, f_0p6

problem description

# Problem setup: The matching formula in the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) gives \begin{align} f(x, \mu) = \tilde{f} (x, P_z) - \int_{0}^1 \frac{d y}{|y|} ~ C^{(1)}\left(\frac{x}{y}, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) \tilde{f}\left(y, P_z\right) ~, \end{align} where f(x,μ)f(x, \mu) denotes the unpolarized parton distribution function (PDF) of the pion, characterized by the momentum fraction xx and the energy scale μ\mu. The corresponding quasi-PDF is denoted as f~\tilde{f}. For purposes of simplification, power corrections are ignored. We see that the perturbative matching kernel in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme is \begin{align} C^{(1)}\left(\xi, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) = \frac{\alpha_s (\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \begin{cases}\left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{\xi}{\xi-1}+1+\frac{3}{2 \xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[1, \infty]}-\frac{3}{2 \xi} & \xi>1 \\ \left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi}\left[-\ln \frac{\mu^2}{4x^2 P_z^2}+\ln (\frac{1-\xi}{\xi}) \right]-\frac{\xi(1+\xi)}{1-\xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[0,1]} & 0<\xi<1, \\ % \left(-\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{-\xi}{1-\xi}-1+\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)}\right)_{+(1)}^{[-\infty, 0]}-\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)} & \xi<0 \end{cases} \end{align} where ξ=x/y\xi = x / y. The subscript +(1)+(1) indicates the plus distribution with the pole at ξ=1\xi = 1. The PDF satisfies the DGLAP evolution according to \begin{align} \begin{aligned} \frac{d f(x, \mu)}{d \ln \mu} &= g\left(x, \mu\right), \\ g\left(x, \mu\right) &= \int_x^1 \frac{d v}{v} P\left[\frac{x}{v}, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] f\left(v, \mu\right) ~. \end{aligned} \end{align} The 1-loop result of the evolution kernel P[w,αs(μ)]P\left[w, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] can be found to be \begin{align} P\left[w, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] = \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{2}{1-w} - 1 - w \right)_{+(1)} ~, w \leq 1, % = \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{4 \pi} \left( 4(1-w)^{-1} - 2 - 2w + 3 \delta(1 - w) \right) ~, \end{align} where w=x/vw = x / v. The 1-loop αs\alpha_s is given by \begin{align} \alpha_s^{(1)}\left(\mu^2\right)=\frac{4 \pi}{\beta_0 \ln \left(\mu^2 / \Lambda_{\rm Q C D}^2\right)} ~. \end{align} The constants are given by 1. CF=43C_F = \frac{4}{3}; 2. β0=9\beta_0 = 9; 3. $\Lambda_{\rm Q C D} = 0.2445$ GeV. Discretize the variables xx, yy, and vv in x,y,v{0.002,0.004,0.006,0.994,0.996,0.998,1}x, y, v \in \{0.002, 0.004, 0.006 \dots, 0.994, 0.996, 0.998, 1\} so that the quasi-PDF f~(x,Pz)\tilde{f}(x, P_z) and PDF f(x,μ)f(x, \mu) are represented by vectors of length 500500 and the convolution kernels can be represented by matrices of dimension 500×500500 \times 500. The pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at Pz=2P_z = 2 GeV is \begin{align} \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~. \end{align} # Main problem: Given the pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at Pz=2P_z = 2 GeV as \begin{align} \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~. \end{align} Using the matching formula to derive the pion PDF f(x,μ)f(x, \mu) at μ=2\mu = 2 GeV in the regime x(0,1)x\in (0, 1), note that the logarithm should be resummed using the DGLAP evolution. Evaluate the PDF at x{0.4,0.5,0.6}x \in \{0.4, 0.5, 0.6\}.
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)

# Problem setup:
The matching formula in the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) gives
\begin{align}
    f(x, \mu) = \tilde{f} (x, P_z) - \int_{0}^1 \frac{d y}{|y|} ~ C^{(1)}\left(\frac{x}{y}, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) \tilde{f}\left(y, P_z\right) ~,
\end{align}
where f(x,μ) denotes the unpolarized parton distribution function (PDF) of the pion, characterized by the momentum fraction x and the energy scale μ. The corresponding quasi-PDF is denoted as (f)~. For purposes of simplification, power corrections are ignored.

We see that the perturbative matching kernel in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme is
\begin{align}
    C^{(1)}\left(\xi, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) = \frac{\alpha_s (\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \begin{cases}\left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{\xi}{\xi-1}+1+\frac{3}{2 \xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[1, \infty]}-\frac{3}{2 \xi} & \xi>1 \\ \left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi}\left[-\ln \frac{\mu^2}{4x^2 P_z^2}+\ln (\frac{1-\xi}{\xi}) \right]-\frac{\xi(1+\xi)}{1-\xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[0,1]} & 0<\xi<1, \\
    % \left(-\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{-\xi}{1-\xi}-1+\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)}\right)_{+(1)}^{[-\infty, 0]}-\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)} & \xi<0
    \end{cases}
\end{align}
where ξ=x/y. The subscript +(1) indicates the plus distribution with the pole at ξ=1.

The PDF satisfies the DGLAP evolution according to
\begin{align}
\begin{aligned}
    \frac{d f(x, \mu)}{d \ln \mu} &= g\left(x, \mu\right), \\
    g\left(x, \mu\right) &= \int_x^1 \frac{d v}{v} P\left[\frac{x}{v}, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] f\left(v, \mu\right) ~.
\end{aligned}
\end{align}
The 1-loop result of the evolution kernel P[w,α_(s)(μ)] can be found to be
\begin{align}
    P\left[w, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] = \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{2}{1-w} - 1 - w \right)_{+(1)} ~, w \leq 1,
    % =  \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{4 \pi} \left( 4(1-w)^{-1} - 2 - 2w  + 3 \delta(1 - w) \right) ~,
\end{align}

where w=x/v.

The 1-loop α_(s) is given by
\begin{align}
    \alpha_s^{(1)}\left(\mu^2\right)=\frac{4 \pi}{\beta_0 \ln \left(\mu^2 / \Lambda_{\rm Q C D}^2\right)} ~.
\end{align}


The constants are given by
1. C_(F)=(4)/(3);
2. β₀=9;
3. $\Lambda_{\rm Q C D} = 0.2445$ GeV.

Discretize the variables x, y, and v in x,y,v∈{0.002,0.004,0.006…,0.994,0.996,0.998,1} so that the quasi-PDF (f)~(x,P_(z)) and PDF f(x,μ) are represented by vectors of length 500 and the convolution kernels can be represented by matrices of dimension 500×500.

The pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at P_(z)=2 GeV is
\begin{align}
    \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~.
\end{align}


# Main problem:


Given the pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at P_(z)=2 GeV as
\begin{align}
    \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~.
\end{align}
Using the matching formula to derive the pion PDF f(x,μ) at μ=2 GeV in the regime x∈(0,1), note that the logarithm should be resummed using the DGLAP evolution. Evaluate the PDF at x∈{0.4,0.5,0.6}.
Original LaTeX notation

# Problem setup:
The matching formula in the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) gives
\begin{align}
    f(x, \mu) = \tilde{f} (x, P_z) - \int_{0}^1 \frac{d y}{|y|} ~ C^{(1)}\left(\frac{x}{y}, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) \tilde{f}\left(y, P_z\right) ~,
\end{align}
where $f(x, \mu)$ denotes the unpolarized parton distribution function (PDF) of the pion, characterized by the momentum fraction $x$ and the energy scale $\mu$. The corresponding quasi-PDF is denoted as $\tilde{f}$. For purposes of simplification, power corrections are ignored.

We see that the perturbative matching kernel in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme is
\begin{align}
    C^{(1)}\left(\xi, \frac{\mu}{|x| P_z}\right) = \frac{\alpha_s (\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \begin{cases}\left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{\xi}{\xi-1}+1+\frac{3}{2 \xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[1, \infty]}-\frac{3}{2 \xi} & \xi>1 \\ \left(\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi}\left[-\ln \frac{\mu^2}{4x^2 P_z^2}+\ln (\frac{1-\xi}{\xi}) \right]-\frac{\xi(1+\xi)}{1-\xi}\right)_{+(1)}^{[0,1]} & 0<\xi<1, \\
    % \left(-\frac{1+\xi^2}{1-\xi} \ln \frac{-\xi}{1-\xi}-1+\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)}\right)_{+(1)}^{[-\infty, 0]}-\frac{3}{2(1-\xi)} & \xi<0
    \end{cases}
\end{align}
where $\xi = x / y$. The subscript $+(1)$ indicates the plus distribution with the pole at $\xi = 1$.

The PDF satisfies the DGLAP evolution according to
\begin{align}
\begin{aligned}
    \frac{d f(x, \mu)}{d \ln \mu} &= g\left(x, \mu\right), \\
    g\left(x, \mu\right) &= \int_x^1 \frac{d v}{v} P\left[\frac{x}{v}, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] f\left(v, \mu\right) ~.
\end{aligned}
\end{align}
The 1-loop result of the evolution kernel $P\left[w, \alpha_s(\mu)\right]$ can be found to be
\begin{align}
    P\left[w, \alpha_s(\mu)\right] = \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{2}{1-w} - 1 - w \right)_{+(1)} ~, w \leq 1,
    % =  \frac{\alpha_s(\mu) C_F}{4 \pi} \left( 4(1-w)^{-1} - 2 - 2w  + 3 \delta(1 - w) \right) ~,
\end{align}

where $w = x / v$.

The 1-loop $\alpha_s$ is given by
\begin{align}
    \alpha_s^{(1)}\left(\mu^2\right)=\frac{4 \pi}{\beta_0 \ln \left(\mu^2 / \Lambda_{\rm Q C D}^2\right)} ~.
\end{align}


The constants are given by
1. $C_F = \frac{4}{3}$;
2. $\beta_0 = 9$;
3. $\Lambda_{\rm Q C D} = 0.2445$ GeV.

Discretize the variables $x$, $y$, and $v$ in $x, y, v \in \{0.002, 0.004, 0.006 \dots, 0.994, 0.996, 0.998, 1\}$ so that the quasi-PDF $\tilde{f}(x, P_z)$ and PDF $f(x, \mu)$ are represented by vectors of length $500$ and the convolution kernels can be represented by matrices of dimension $500 \times 500$.

The pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at $P_z = 2$ GeV is
\begin{align}
    \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~.
\end{align}


# Main problem:


Given the pion quasi-PDF in $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme at $P_z = 2$ GeV as
\begin{align}
    \tilde{f}(x, P_z) = (x + 3) \cdot (1-x)^3, \quad x\in (0, 1) ~.
\end{align}
Using the matching formula to derive the pion PDF $f(x, \mu)$ at $\mu = 2$ GeV in the regime $x\in (0, 1)$, note that the logarithm should be resummed using the DGLAP evolution. Evaluate the PDF at $x \in \{0.4, 0.5, 0.6\}$.

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import