Benchmark AI / Public workspace
CritPt / Challenge_62_main / Quantum superposition of a single particle can be demonstrated by the…
Problem
Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.
code template
Code
import sympy as sp
phi = sp.symbols('phi')
k = sp.symbols('k', integer=True)
def answer(phi, k, k_value):
r"""
Return the violation as a function of $\phi$ for the case $k=1$, and the expressions of $T$ and $\phi_{\max}$ in Sympy format for any given k_value.
Inputs
----------
phi: sympy.Symbol, phase angle $\phi$
k: sympy.Symbol, $k$
k_value: int
A specific value of $k$ used to determine which interval expression to return, but is *not* substituted into the final result.
Outputs
----------
violation: sympy.Expr, the violation $\delta$ as a function of $\phi$ for the case $k=1 (N=2k+1=3)$.
T: sympy.Interval, the interval $T \subseteq [0,\pi]$ of phases for which a quantum violation occurs.
Explicitly set the parameters `left_open` and `right_open`.
phi_max: sympy.Expr, the phase $\phi_{\max}$ at which the maximal quantum violation occurs.
The returned expressions of T and phi_max should preserve full symbolic dependence on k, while `k_value` is used internally solely to to select which interval expression to return.
"""
# ------------------ FILL IN YOUR RESULTS BELOW ------------------
violation = ...
T = ...
phi_max = ...
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
return violation, T, phi_maxproblem description
# Problem setup:
Quantum superposition of a single particle can be demonstrated by the interference pattern observed in a double-slit experiment. Although it has been shown that no genuine triple-slit interference exists for a single quantum particle, an -slit experiment can still reveal stronger nonclassical patterns, detectable through violations of the following inequality (Note: A classical theory that allows -slit inteference cannot violate such an inequality.):
where represents the statistics of getting outcome when each path encodes .
To see the violation, a quantum particle is prepared among paths, such that with
$|e_i\rangle=|0\rangle_{A_1}\cdots|1\rangle_{A_i}\cdots|0⟩_{A_N}$. Each party encodes a local phase on their path given input , by applying the unitary . The resulting encoded state is given by
$$\sigma_{a_1,\cdots,a_n}= \bigotimes_i U_i(\phi_{a_i}) |\Psi_N\rangle\langle\Psi_N|\bigotimes_i U_i^{\dagger}(\phi_{a_i}),$$
which is measured using a fixed measurement , and the statistics are given by
We consider a specific encoding strategy for an odd number of paths, , as follows:
Set for ; for ; for ; and for all .
# Main problem:
(1) For the case , express the violation as a function of , i.e., the violation is defined as
(2) Determine the range of for which a quantum violation occurs, denoted as , where is a function of .
(3) Determine the value of at which the maximal quantum violation occurs, denoted as , as a function of .Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
# Problem setup:
Quantum superposition of a single particle can be demonstrated by the interference pattern observed in a double-slit experiment. Although it has been shown that no genuine triple-slit interference exists for a single quantum particle, an N-slit experiment can still reveal stronger nonclassical patterns, detectable through violations of the following inequality (Note: A classical theory that allows N−1-slit inteference cannot violate such an inequality.):
p(0|0,⋯,0)+∑_(i=1)^(N)p(1|0,⋯,1_(i),⋯,0)≤N,
where p(b|a₁,⋯,a_(n)) represents the statistics of getting outcome b when each path encodes a_(i).
To see the violation, a quantum particle is prepared among N paths, such that |Ψ_(N)⟩=(1)/(√(N))∑_(i=1)^(N)|e_(i)⟩ with $|e_i\rangle=|0\rangle_{A_1}\cdots|1\rangle_{A_i}\cdots|0⟩_{A_N}$. Each party encodes a local phase on their path i given input a_(i), by applying the unitary U_(i)(ϕ_(a_(i)))=e^(iϕ_(a_(i)))|1_(i)⟩⟨1_(i)|. The resulting encoded state is given by
$$\sigma_{a_1,\cdots,a_n}= \bigotimes_i U_i(\phi_{a_i}) |\Psi_N\rangle\langle\Psi_N|\bigotimes_i U_i^{\dagger}(\phi_{a_i}),$$
which is measured using a fixed measurement {Π_(b)}_(b), and the statistics are given by
p(b|a₁,⋯,a_(n))=Tr[Π_(b)σ_(a₁,⋯,a_(n))].
We consider a specific encoding strategy for an odd number of paths, N=2k+1, as follows:
Set ϕ_(1_(i))=ϕ for i≤k; ϕ_(1_(i))=π for i=k+1; ϕ_(1_(i))=−ϕ for i>k+1; and ϕ_(i₀)=0 for all i.
# Main problem:
(1) For the case k=1(N=2k+1=3), express the violation as a function of ϕ, i.e., the violation is defined as
δ=p(0|0,⋯,0)+∑_(i=1)^(N)p(1|0,⋯,1_(i),⋯,0)−N.
(2) Determine the range of ϕ for which a quantum violation occurs, denoted as T, where T⊆[0,π] is a function of k.
(3) Determine the value of ϕ at which the maximal quantum violation occurs, denoted as ϕ_(max), as a function of k.Original LaTeX notation
# Problem setup:
Quantum superposition of a single particle can be demonstrated by the interference pattern observed in a double-slit experiment. Although it has been shown that no genuine triple-slit interference exists for a single quantum particle, an $N$-slit experiment can still reveal stronger nonclassical patterns, detectable through violations of the following inequality (Note: A classical theory that allows $N-1$-slit inteference cannot violate such an inequality.):
$$
p(0|0,\cdots,0) + \sum_{i=1}^N p(1|0,\cdots,1_i,\cdots,0) \leq N,
$$
where $p(b|a_1,\cdots,a_n)$ represents the statistics of getting outcome $b$ when each path encodes $a_i$.
To see the violation, a quantum particle is prepared among $N$ paths, such that $|\Psi_N\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum^N_{i=1} |e_i\rangle$ with $|e_i\rangle=|0\rangle_{A_1}\cdots|1\rangle_{A_i}\cdots|0⟩_{A_N}$. Each party encodes a local phase on their path $i$ given input $a_i$, by applying the unitary $U_i(\phi_{a_i}) = e^{i\phi_{a_i}}|1_i\rangle\langle1_i|$. The resulting encoded state is given by
$$\sigma_{a_1,\cdots,a_n}= \bigotimes_i U_i(\phi_{a_i}) |\Psi_N\rangle\langle\Psi_N|\bigotimes_i U_i^{\dagger}(\phi_{a_i}),$$
which is measured using a fixed measurement $\{\Pi_b\}_b$, and the statistics are given by
$$p(b|a_1,\cdots,a_n)=Tr[\Pi_b \sigma_{a_1,\cdots,a_n}].$$
We consider a specific encoding strategy for an odd number of paths, $N = 2k + 1$, as follows:
Set $\phi_{1_i} = \phi$ for $i \leq k$; $\phi_{1_i} = \pi$ for $i = k + 1$; $\phi_{1_i} = -\phi$ for $i > k + 1$; and $\phi_{i_0} = 0$ for all $i$.
# Main problem:
(1) For the case $k=1 (N=2k+1=3)$, express the violation as a function of $\phi$, i.e., the violation is defined as
$$
\delta= p(0|0,\cdots,0) + \sum_{i=1}^N p(1|0,\cdots,1_i,\cdots,0)- N.
$$
(2) Determine the range of $\phi$ for which a quantum violation occurs, denoted as $T$, where $T \subseteq [0, \pi]$ is a function of $k$.
(3) Determine the value of $\phi$ at which the maximal quantum violation occurs, denoted as $\phi_{\max} $, as a function of $k$.Discussion
No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
Artifacts
Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.
No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
Source and history
initial import