benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace
CritPt / Challenge_53_main / The ambient metric is defined as follows:
Problem
Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.
code template
Code
import sympy as sp
d = sp.symbols('d')
def answer(d):
r"""
Return the expressions of the coefficients in SymPy format.
Inputs
----------
d: sympy.Symbol, variable, $d$
Output
----------
coeff1: sympy.Expr, the coefficient in front of $P^{k}{}_{i} P_{kj}$
coeff2: sympy.Expr, the coefficient in front of $B_{k(i}P^k{}_{j)}$
"""
# ------------------ FILL IN YOUR RESULT BELOW ------------------
coeff1 = ... # a SymPy expression of inputs
coeff2 = ... # a SymPy expression of inputs
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
return coeff1, coeff2problem description
# Problem setup:
The ambient metric is defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
ds^2 = 2\rho dt^2 + 2t dt d\rho + t^2 \gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)dx^{i}dx^{j}\,,
\end{equation}
where can be expanded asymptotically in terms of as
\begin{align}
\gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)&= \gamma^{(0)}_{ij}(x)+ \gamma^{(1)}_{ij}(x)\rho +\gamma^{(2)}_{ij}(x)\rho^2 + \cdots\,.
\end{align}
Given , the higher-order terms in the expansion can be solved order by order from the Ricci-flatness condition of the ambient metric. For , each has a pole at .
On the other hand, the Riemann tensor of the ambient metric defines the th extended obstruction tensor in the following way:
\begin{equation}
\Omega^{(k)}_{ij}= R_{\rho ij\rho;\underbrace{\scriptstyle \rho\cdots \rho}_{k-1}}|_{\rho=0,t=1}.
\end{equation}
This tensor also has a pole at . The residue of is proportional to that of .
# Main problem:
Suppose . Show that for , is proportional to and , respectively. Determine these two coefficients.
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
# Problem setup:
The ambient metric is defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
ds^2 = 2\rho dt^2 + 2t dt d\rho + t^2 \gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)dx^{i}dx^{j}\,,
\end{equation}
where γ_(ij)(x,ρ) can be expanded asymptotically in terms of ρ as
\begin{align}
\gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)&= \gamma^{(0)}_{ij}(x)+ \gamma^{(1)}_{ij}(x)\rho +\gamma^{(2)}_{ij}(x)\rho^2 + \cdots\,.
\end{align}
Given γ_(ij)^((0)), the higher-order terms in the expansion can be solved order by order from the Ricci-flatness condition of the ambient metric. For k≥2, each γ_(ij)^((k))(x) has a pole at d=2k.
On the other hand, the Riemann tensor of the ambient metric defines the kth extended obstruction tensor Ω_(ij)^((k)) in the following way:
\begin{equation}
\Omega^{(k)}_{ij}= R_{\rho ij\rho;\underbrace{\scriptstyle \rho\cdots \rho}_{k-1}}|_{\rho=0,t=1}.
\end{equation}
This tensor also has a pole at d=2k+2. The residue of γ_(ij)^((k))(x) is proportional to that of Ω_(ij)^((k−1)).
# Main problem:
Suppose Res_(d=2k)γ_(ij)^((k))=A_(k)Res_(d=2k)Ω_(ij)^((k−1)). Show that for k=2,3, γ_(ij)^((k))−A_(k)Ω_(ij)^((k−1)) is proportional to P^(k)_(i)P_(kj) and B_(k(i)P^(k)_(j)), respectively. Determine these two coefficients.Original LaTeX notation
# Problem setup:
The ambient metric is defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
ds^2 = 2\rho dt^2 + 2t dt d\rho + t^2 \gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)dx^{i}dx^{j}\,,
\end{equation}
where $\gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)$ can be expanded asymptotically in terms of $\rho$ as
\begin{align}
\gamma_{ij}(x,\rho)&= \gamma^{(0)}_{ij}(x)+ \gamma^{(1)}_{ij}(x)\rho +\gamma^{(2)}_{ij}(x)\rho^2 + \cdots\,.
\end{align}
Given $\gamma^{(0)}_{ij}$, the higher-order terms in the expansion can be solved order by order from the Ricci-flatness condition of the ambient metric. For $k\geqslant 2$, each $\gamma^{(k)}_{ij}(x)$ has a pole at $d=2k$.
On the other hand, the Riemann tensor of the ambient metric defines the $k$th extended obstruction tensor $\Omega^{(k)}_{ij}$ in the following way:
\begin{equation}
\Omega^{(k)}_{ij}= R_{\rho ij\rho;\underbrace{\scriptstyle \rho\cdots \rho}_{k-1}}|_{\rho=0,t=1}.
\end{equation}
This tensor also has a pole at $d=2k+2$. The residue of $\gamma^{(k)}_{ij}(x)$ is proportional to that of $\Omega^{(k-1)}_{ij}$.
# Main problem:
Suppose $\text{Res}_{d=2k}\gamma^{(k)}_{ij}=A_k\text{Res}_{d=2k}\Omega^{(k-1)}_{ij}$. Show that for $k=2,3$, $\gamma^{(k)}_{ij}-A_k\Omega^{(k-1)}_{ij}$ is proportional to $P^{k}{}_{i} P_{kj}$ and $B_{k(i}P^k{}_{j)}$, respectively. Determine these two coefficients.Discussion
No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
See answer Answer published by the source
Artifacts
Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.
No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
Source and history
initial import