benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

AMC (AIMO validation set)

Mathematics

83 AMC 12 problems assembled by Project Numina as a validation set for the AIMO competition. They sit a step below AIME in difficulty, which makes them a useful lower rung on the same scale.

amc

Full text83 tasks

Official source

Full text: eligible public problems include text, images and discussion.

History

Project Numina assembled this AMC validation set for the AIMO competition, publishing it under AI-MO on Hugging Face in July 2024. It uses AMC 12 competition problems to assess mathematical problem solving at a level below AIME, providing a less demanding complement to harder competition evaluations.

How it was built

The set contains 83 existing AMC 12 problems, rather than questions newly written for evaluating language models. Each record pairs a problem statement with a numeric answer and identifies an upstream Art of Problem Solving page. The catalogue includes all 83 problems, while excluding answers and solution-bearing upstream pages from the prompt.

At a glance

What a problem looks like

One competition problem statement. The numeric answer is not part of the prompt, and neither is the Art of Problem Solving page, which is recorded as the problem’s upstream identifier because that page also carries a solution.

Read an actual problem

How it is scored

The source ships the numeric answer with every problem; this catalogue keeps it in restricted storage and never renders it.

Why it is hard

AMC problems reward a single clean idea rather than a long construction, so failures here point at missing technique rather than at lost arithmetic.

Limitations and criticism

This is a small selection of competition mathematics, so a handful of outcomes can substantially change an aggregate score. Its existing problems and publicly available solution pages create a potential route for training-data contamination, although their availability alone does not establish exposure by any particular model. Numeric-answer evaluation also leaves the validity of the intermediate reasoning unmeasured.

Discussion

1 thread and 0 posts on this page. Anyone may reply; no account is required.

Contribute

Share a reproduction, report an evaluation issue, or suggest a correction to this benchmark overview.

Tasks

Whole public benchmark.

Public problems
83
Formats
math (83)
Problems with images
0
Answer availability
Answer published by the source (83)
Configs
default (83)
Splits
train (83)
Awaiting a first discussion
83
Problems with a discussion
0
Public contributions
0

Provenance and terms

Pinned source revisions, newest first:

  • 69d78a4a2c840e82d69af6bc742bda09005f6316 · acquired 2026-09-12 · release f88229dded35
  • 69d78a4a2c840e82d69af6bc742bda09005f6316 · acquired 2026-09-12 · release 4078a47d8a62
  • 69d78a4a2c840e82d69af6bc742bda09005f6316 · acquired 2026-09-12 · release 920cd2975153