Discussion
0 posts
No posts in this thread yet.
benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace
Reasoning
DROP is a reading-comprehension benchmark whose questions require discrete operations over the paragraph — addition, subtraction, comparison, counting, sorting. It is built so that extracting a span cannot answer them.
drop
Full text: eligible public problems include text, images and discussion.
The Allen Institute for AI and collaborating researchers introduced DROP in 2019 to test reading comprehension that requires discrete reasoning over a passage. It targeted operations such as counting, comparison and arithmetic that were poorly captured by benchmarks focused on locating an answer span. The March 2022 publication date for this source describes the ucinlp Hugging Face distribution rather than the original benchmark release.
DROP was built from Wikipedia passages, with crowdworkers writing questions that require reasoning over the information they contain. Its collection process used an existing question-answering model as an adversary to discourage questions that the model could already answer. Answers can be numbers, dates or text spans, and the source validation split contains 9,535 questions. Evaluation uses exact match and an answer-level F1 measure.
A passage and a question about it. The answer spans and numbers are not part of the prompt.
The source ships answer spans with every question; this catalogue keeps them in restricted storage and never renders them.
Metric: exact match and macro-averaged F1 over the answer spans
Evaluation conditions differ between rows, so this is not a ranking. Rows marked vendor are reports by the model’s own organization.
| Model | Score | Metric | Setup | Reported by | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek | 89 | F1 | Base model; 3-shot. | vendor (self-reported) | Base Model, Standard Benchmarks, DROP (F1), final column |
The passage contains the facts but not the answer. Getting it right means locating several numbers, deciding which operation relates them, and carrying it out exactly.
DROP combines language understanding with discrete operations, so an incorrect answer does not isolate whether the failure came from reading, selecting facts or calculation. It includes span answers as well as numerical answers; it is not a pure arithmetic test. Exact match and F1 grade the final answer rather than the derivation, and partial overlap credit should not be read as proof of a partially correct reasoning process.
The vendor report recorded here gives the DeepSeek-V3 base model an F1 score of 89.0 in a three-shot setup. This is high on the reported metric but still below its ceiling, and it does not imply that 89 percent of questions were answered exactly correctly. That single result is insufficient to establish current saturation or the performance of systems using other prompting and evaluation settings.
@article{dua2019drop,
title={DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs},
author={Dheeru Dua and Yizhong Wang and Pradeep Dasigi and Gabriel Stanovsky and Sameer Singh and Matt Gardner},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00161},
year={2019}
}1 thread and 0 posts on this page. Anyone may reply; no account is required.
Share a reproduction, report an evaluation issue, or suggest a correction to this benchmark overview.
0 posts
No posts in this thread yet.
Whole public benchmark.
Pinned source revisions, newest first:
95cda593fae71b60b5b19f82de3fcf3298c1239c · acquired 2026-09-12 · release c2d8b15a0e8995cda593fae71b60b5b19f82de3fcf3298c1239c · acquired 2026-09-12 · release 974819cfe35695cda593fae71b60b5b19f82de3fcf3298c1239c · acquired 2026-09-12 · release fc596d0216e7Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source
Answer published by the source