benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) / A few players are playing a boardgame. The current state of the game is as…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

A few players are playing a boardgame. The current state of the game is as follows. The rhino is currently in Ottawa. The stork stops the victory of the rhino. And the rules of the game are as follows. Rule1: If the butterfly disarms the rhino and the stork stops the victory of the rhino, then the rhino will not enjoy the company of the badger. Rule2: From observing that an animal wants to see the pigeon, one can conclude the following: that animal does not borrow a weapon from the bulldog. Rule3: From observing that an animal does not enjoy the company of the badger, one can conclude the following: that animal will not borrow one of the weapons of the dragon. Rule4: Regarding the rhino, if it is in Canada at the moment, then we can conclude that it enjoys the company of the badger. Rule5: If there is evidence that one animal, no matter which one, enjoys the company of the badger, then the shark borrows one of the weapons of the dragon undoubtedly. Rule6: This is a basic rule: if the pigeon wants to see the dugong, then the conclusion that "the dugong wants to see the pigeon" follows immediately and effectively. Rule7: The living creature that swears to the gadwall will never manage to persuade the peafowl. Rule8: There exists an animal which manages to convince the peafowl? Then the pigeon definitely wants to see the dugong. Rule9: The songbird manages to persuade the peafowl whenever at least one animal borrows a weapon from the dragon. Rule10: From observing that an animal does not neglect the gorilla, one can conclude the following: that animal will not want to see the dugong. Rule1 is preferred over Rule4. Rule10 is preferred over Rule8. Rule3 is preferred over Rule5. Rule7 is preferred over Rule9. A rule is only applicable if all of its antecedents can be proved. If a rule is preferred over the other, it means whenever both of them can be applied to derive new conclusions and those conclusions contradict with each other (e.g., from one we derive X and from the other we derive not X), we should go with the conclusion from the rule with higher preference. Based on the facts, rules, and preferences, what is the truth value of the statement,  does the dugong borrow one of the weapons of the bulldog? Answer 'proved' if it can be proved, 'disproved' if it can be disproved, and 'unknown' if it can neither be proved nor disproved.

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
54604cb0-3e1a-5173-a595-59bc455079ce
task_key
bbeh~5fboardgame~5fqa--full--54604cb0-3e1a-5173-a595-59bc455079ce
task_revision_id
1
config / split
bbeh_boardgame_qa / full

Official source

initial import