benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) / You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts, to arrange them in alphabetical order.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: percent maser roadside we're caching distort phillip emboss epistemology gherkin somewhat spicy injustice winston savoyard delicious defend indicate
Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: "percent": "p" (16). "maser": "m" (13). "roadside": "r" (18). "we're": "w" (23). "caching": "c" (3). "distort": "d" (4). "phillip": "p" (16). "emboss": "e" (5). "epistemology": "e" (5). "gherkin": "g" (7). "somewhat": "s" (19). "spicy": "s" (19). "injustice": "i" (9). "winston": "w" (23). "savoyard": "s" (19). "delicious": "d" (4). "defend": "d" (4). "indicate": "i" (9).
Thought 2: We now have: (3) "caching" < (4) ["delicious" ? "defend" ? "distort"] < (5) ["emboss" ? "epistemology"] < (7) "gherkin" < (9) ["indicate" ? "injustice"] < (13) "maser" < (16) ["percent" ? "phillip"] < (18) "roadside" < (19) ["somewhat" ? "spicy" ? "savoyard"] < (23) ["we're" ? "winston"].
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ["delicious" ? "defend" ? "distort"] by looking at their second letters. The second letter: "delicious": "e" (5). "defend": "e" (5). "distort": "i" (9).
Thought 4: We now have: (5) ["delicious" ? "defend"] < (9) "distort" for the subpart.
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ["delicious" ? "defend"] by looking at their third letters. The third letter: "delicious": "l" (12). "defend": "f" (6).
Thought 6: We now have: (6) "defend" < (12) "delicious" for the subpart. Hence, we have "caching" < "defend" < "delicious" < "distort" < "emboss" < "epistemology" < "gherkin" < "indicate" < "injustice" < "maser" < "percent" < "phillip" < "roadside" < "somewhat" < "spicy" < "savoyard" < "we're" < "winston".
Thought 7: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is caching defend delicious distort emboss epistemology gherkin indicate injustice maser percent phillip roadside somewhat spicy savoyard we're winston
Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
fb7149b1-8266-5a45-8276-0b3945358925
task_key
bbeh~5fword~5fsorting--full--fb7149b1-8266-5a45-8276-0b3945358925
task_revision_id
1
config / split
bbeh_word_sorting / full

Official source

initial import