benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First, being an ingredient of Hope…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First, being an ingredient of Hope Moisture Mask is sufficient for being an ingredient of Miracle Concealer. Second, nothing is neither an ingredient of All Day Body Wash nor an ingredient of Hope Moisture Mask. We may conclude: Being an ingredient of All Day Body Wash is sufficient for not being an ingredient of Miracle Concealer."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
06a3b50a-15f8-5247-a55c-4899b941b55a
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--06a3b50a-15f8-5247-a55c-4899b941b55a
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import