benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every frequent consumer of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every frequent consumer of Pre De Provence soap is not a rare consumer of Aussie shampoo and not a frequent consumer of Bio Ionic shampoo. From this follows: No frequent consumer of Bio Ionic shampoo and no rare consumer of Aussie shampoo is a frequent consumer of Pre De Provence soap."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
12672a8f-6779-51ea-b0aa-cf55f8bfe944
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--12672a8f-6779-51ea-b0aa-cf55f8bfe944
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import