benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To start with, something is an…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To start with, something is an ingredient of C-Note Green and not an ingredient of Loose pearls. Now, every ingredient of Blue Taffy Acrylic is an ingredient of Loose pearls. We may conclude: Not every ingredient of C-Note Green is an ingredient of Blue Taffy Acrylic."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
1ace8055-0a51-59bd-8170-d7ac1f10ee0c
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--1ace8055-0a51-59bd-8170-d7ac1f10ee0c
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import