benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer products. The following argument pertains to this question: To begin with, being an ingredient of Aquablush is sufficient for being an ingredient of NARS Duo Eyeshadow. Moreover, whatever is neither an ingredient of Stop and Stare nor an ingredient of A.D LIPSTICK CHIC is an ingredient of Lash Tinsel Mascara or an ingredient of Aquablush.finally, everything that is an ingredient of Lash Tinsel Mascara is an ingredient of NARS Duo Eyeshadow, too. Therefore, whatever is not an ingredient of NARS Duo Eyeshadow is however an ingredient of Stop and Stare or an ingredient of A.D LIPSTICK CHIC."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
2e9710a3-1717-5234-ba14-58d3be6a6ef4
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--2e9710a3-1717-5234-ba14-58d3be6a6ef4
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import