benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer products. The following argument pertains to this question: First of all, being an ingredient of OPULENCE (IMPERIAL) is sufficient for being an ingredient of Misty Morning. Next, being an ingredient of OPULENCE (IMPERIAL) is necessary for not being an ingredient of Moon Spell. So, necessarily, whatever is not an ingredient of Moon Spell is an ingredient of Misty Morning."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
34c13f3c-143b-55d3-bcfb-5755c771cc7c
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--34c13f3c-143b-55d3-bcfb-5755c771cc7c
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import