benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every owner of a Finesse…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every owner of a Finesse shampoo is either a regular consumer of TIGI shampoo or a loyal buyer of Paul Mitchell soap, or both. Next, every rare consumer of Alterna Haircare shampoo is not a regular consumer of TIGI shampoo or not a loyal buyer of Paul Mitchell soap. We may conclude: Whoever is an owner of a Finesse shampoo is not a rare consumer of Alterna Haircare shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
45f8cd8f-df1f-5211-9cdb-7b309c2f080d
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--45f8cd8f-df1f-5211-9cdb-7b309c2f080d
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import