benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following argument pertains to this question: First premise: Whoever is not a regular consumer of Pantene shampoo is not a rare consumer of South of France soap or not a rare consumer of Kiss My Face soap. Second premise: Being a rare consumer of South of France soap is necessary for not being a frequent consumer of Proactiv soap. Third premise: Nobody is neither a frequent consumer of Proactiv soap nor a rare consumer of Kiss My Face soap. So, necessarily, whoever is not a frequent consumer of Proactiv soap is a regular consumer of Pantene shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
4efce57c-367f-5f34-baf4-beb89fc44c57
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--4efce57c-367f-5f34-baf4-beb89fc44c57
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import