benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To start with, everyone who is both a…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To start with, everyone who is both a rare consumer of Pantene shampoo and an occasional purchaser of Herbal Essences shampoo is a frequent consumer of Tom's of Maine soap or a regular user of Mysore soap. Now, every frequent consumer of Tom's of Maine soap is neither a rare consumer of Pantene shampoo nor an occasional purchaser of Herbal Essences shampoo. We may conclude that everyone who is not both a rare consumer of Pantene shampoo and an occasional purchaser of Herbal Essences shampoo is however a regular user of Mysore soap."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
5012d59c-11ad-5b59-8e08-b6814cdd77fb
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--5012d59c-11ad-5b59-8e08-b6814cdd77fb
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import