benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Sophie is an infrequent user of Nioxin…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Sophie is an infrequent user of Nioxin shampoo. Every owner of a Nexxus shampoo and every infrequent user of Nioxin shampoo is a frequent consumer of Schwarzkopf shampoo. In consequence, Sophie is a frequent consumer of Schwarzkopf shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
59dd3239-e0bb-516c-9fe7-fb584f9dcb99
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--59dd3239-e0bb-516c-9fe7-fb584f9dcb99
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import