benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Whoever is an occasional…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Whoever is an occasional purchaser of Suave shampoo is not a regular user of Ivory soap. We may conclude that being a regular user of Ivory soap is sufficient for not being an occasional purchaser of Suave shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
6410bd39-f5b3-5b39-a882-149b4e42faa0
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--6410bd39-f5b3-5b39-a882-149b4e42faa0
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import