benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"It is not always easy to see which chemicals are contained in our consumer products. The following argument pertains to this question: First of all, being an ingredient of MENS NULL Face Wash is sufficient for not being an ingredient of Flex Foundation. Next, being an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Shell) is sufficient for not being an ingredient of Flex Foundation. Plus,every ingredient of LIP BUTTER is an ingredient of MENS NULL Face Wash or an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Shell). All this entails that being an ingredient of LIP BUTTER is sufficient for not being an ingredient of Flex Foundation."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
6e47afaa-105d-5d46-8f26-37ce2aa6bfb0
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--6e47afaa-105d-5d46-8f26-37ce2aa6bfb0
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import