benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every loyal buyer of Tocca…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, every loyal buyer of Tocca soap is an occasional purchaser of Bentley Organic soap. Next, being a loyal buyer of Tocca soap is sufficient for being a frequent consumer of L'Oreal shampoo. Plus,some regular user of Lever soap is not an occasional purchaser of Bentley Organic soap or not a frequent consumer of L'Oreal shampoo. We may conclude that not every regular user of Lever soap is a loyal buyer of Tocca soap."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
7026b975-e544-5ea4-9c45-f83ec575ace9
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--7026b975-e544-5ea4-9c45-f83ec575ace9
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import