benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To be an ingredient of Plumeria Milk…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: To be an ingredient of Plumeria Milk Bath or an ingredient of Hot Rod Red is necessary for being an ingredient of Trugel Vivid. Every ingredient of Bioglitz Color 6G is not an ingredient of Plumeria Milk Bath or not an ingredient of Hot Rod Red. All this entails that being an ingredient of Trugel Vivid is sufficient for not being an ingredient of Bioglitz Color 6G."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
83f34a09-2d1a-5cc5-bab4-9937ec0edbaa
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--83f34a09-2d1a-5cc5-bab4-9937ec0edbaa
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import