benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First, everything that is both an…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First, everything that is both an ingredient of DAGGER TATTOO LINER and an ingredient of AMANDE MILK VEIL is not an ingredient of All Wrapped Up. Second, being an ingredient of All Wrapped Up is necessary for being an ingredient of Gloss cuivre nacre. Hence, whatever is not an ingredient of DAGGER TATTOO LINER and not an ingredient of AMANDE MILK VEIL is however an ingredient of Gloss cuivre nacre."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
8a117c89-3756-5ffa-8d90-544ea57d8932
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--8a117c89-3756-5ffa-8d90-544ea57d8932
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import