benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, being an ingredient of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, being an ingredient of Hair and Body Wash is sufficient for being an ingredient of Fungus Treatment. Next, every ingredient of Lip Gloss (BCMK) that is an ingredient of Fungus Treatment is also an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Bronze). Plus,everything that is an ingredient of Hair and Body Wash is an ingredient of Lip Gloss (BCMK), too. We may conclude that being an ingredient of Hair and Body Wash is sufficient for being an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Bronze)."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
97ae2040-b524-56aa-8c2d-db15eb2482b1
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--97ae2040-b524-56aa-8c2d-db15eb2482b1
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import