benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, nobody is neither a…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First of all, nobody is neither a classmate of Georgia nor an ancestor of Geraldine. Next, every workmate of Regina is both a classmate of Georgia and a workmate of Carole. Plus,being an ancestor of Geraldine is necessary for not being a workmate of Carole. Therefore, everyone who is a workmate of Regina is an ancestor of Geraldine, too."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
9cad3ffc-926e-5599-b33d-4bcb13006dca
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--9cad3ffc-926e-5599-b33d-4bcb13006dca
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import