benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Whoever is not a cousin of Andres is a…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Whoever is not a cousin of Andres is a workmate of Isaac. Nobody is neither a grandson of Reyes nor a workmate of Isaac. No stepbrother of Phillip is both a grandson of Reyes and a cousin of Andres. Therefore, being a workmate of Isaac is necessary for being a stepbrother of Phillip."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
caa585af-9175-520a-9ac3-f728949ec013
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--caa585af-9175-520a-9ac3-f728949ec013
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import